Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 03:57:39PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> [ For extra bonus points: the SUSPEND_POSSIBLE thing is still pretty
>> complicated, and it might actually be a better idea to make it a
>> per-arch config option,
...
> This would give you "trying to
Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 03:57:39PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
[ For extra bonus points: the SUSPEND_POSSIBLE thing is still pretty
complicated, and it might actually be a better idea to make it a
per-arch config option,
...
This would give you trying to assign
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 03:57:39PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 28 Jul 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > The dependency of SUSPEND_SMP on HOTPLUG_CPU is quite unintuitive, so
> > what about something like the patch below?
>
> Yeah, this looks reasonable.
>
> May I suggest
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 03:57:39PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
The dependency of SUSPEND_SMP on HOTPLUG_CPU is quite unintuitive, so
what about something like the patch below?
Yeah, this looks reasonable.
May I suggest another level of
4 matches
Mail list logo
