[2.6 patch] fs/super.c: unexport user_get_super

2005-09-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
There's no modular usage in the kernel and modules shouldn't use this symbol. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- This patch was already sent on: - 22 Aug 2005 - 30 May 2005 - 13 May 2005 - 1 May 2005 - 23 Apr 2005 --- linux-2.6.12-rc2-mm3-full/fs/super.c.old2005-04-23 02:4

Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] fs/super.c: unexport user_get_super

2005-08-23 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 06:20:56PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > I didn't find any modular usage in the kernel. And there shouldn't be one either. This is really just for some syscalls, everything else should use get_super based on a struct block_device. If there's any caller using this wrongly in

[RFC: 2.6 patch] fs/super.c: unexport user_get_super

2005-08-22 Thread Adrian Bunk
I didn't find any modular usage in the kernel. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- This patch was already sent on: - 30 May 2005 - 13 May 2005 - 1 May 2005 - 23 Apr 2005 --- linux-2.6.12-rc2-mm3-full/fs/super.c.old2005-04-23 02:45:59.0 +0200 +++ linux-2.6.12-rc2-mm3-

[RFC: 2.6 patch] fs/super.c: unexport user_get_super

2005-04-22 Thread Adrian Bunk
I didn't find any modular usage in the kernel. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- linux-2.6.12-rc2-mm3-full/fs/super.c.old2005-04-23 02:45:59.0 +0200 +++ linux-2.6.12-rc2-mm3-full/fs/super.c2005-04-23 02:46:07.0 +0200 @@ -467,8 +467,6 @@ retur