On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 02:22:40PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> In C99 (and therefore in gcc >= 4.3), "extern inline" means that the
> function should be compiled inline where the inline definition is seen,
> and that the compiler should also emit a copy of the function body with
> an externally
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 11:27:55AM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 03:03:30AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > "extern inline" will have different semantics with gcc 4.3,
> > and "static inline" is correct here.
>
> The idea was to have a linker error in case gcc should decied
Hi,
On 7/9/07, Ralf Baechle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 03:03:30AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> "extern inline" will have different semantics with gcc 4.3,
> and "static inline" is correct here.
The idea was to have a linker error in case gcc should deciede for some
reaso
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 03:03:30AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> "extern inline" will have different semantics with gcc 4.3,
> and "static inline" is correct here.
The idea was to have a linker error in case gcc should deciede for some
reason not to inline this function which as I understand will c
"extern inline" will have different semantics with gcc 4.3,
and "static inline" is correct here.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
--- linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/include/asm-mips/processor.h.old 2007-07-07
01:06:35.0 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/include/asm-mips/proces
5 matches
Mail list logo