Re: [2.6 patch] remove the broken VIDEO_ZR36120 driver

2006-11-29 Thread Peter Schlaf
Pauline Middelink schrieb: > On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 around 20:11:35 +0100, Peter Schlaf wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I would like to see this driver fixed and remaining in the kernel and >> would give any support I can to achive this goal. >> >> I have a zr36120 based tv card and wrote a driver on my own ba

Re: [2.6 patch] remove the broken VIDEO_ZR36120 driver

2006-11-28 Thread Pauline Middelink
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 around 20:11:35 +0100, Peter Schlaf wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to see this driver fixed and remaining in the kernel and > would give any support I can to achive this goal. > > I have a zr36120 based tv card and wrote a driver on my own based on > this kernel driver from

Re: [2.6 patch] remove the broken VIDEO_ZR36120 driver

2006-11-28 Thread Peter Schlaf
Mauro Carvalho Chehab schrieb: > Hi Joe, > > Em Seg, 2006-11-27 às 22:36 -0800, Joe Feise escreveu: >> Adrian Bunk wrote on 11/27/06 22:07: >> >>> On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 09:30:27PM -0800, Joe Feise wrote: Adrian Bunk wrote on 11/25/06 11:15: > But if anyone wants to ever revive this

Re: [2.6 patch] remove the broken VIDEO_ZR36120 driver

2006-11-28 Thread Alan
> Hmm, there are people out there (like me) who still use it and have patched it > to get it working on 2.6.x. If the maintainer has vanished can you post the patches here instead for review ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EM

Re: [2.6 patch] remove the broken VIDEO_ZR36120 driver

2006-11-28 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Hi Joe, Em Seg, 2006-11-27 às 22:36 -0800, Joe Feise escreveu: > Adrian Bunk wrote on 11/27/06 22:07: > > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 09:30:27PM -0800, Joe Feise wrote: > >> Adrian Bunk wrote on 11/25/06 11:15: > >> > >>> But if anyone wants to ever revive this driver, the code is still > >>> pres

Re: [2.6 patch] remove the broken VIDEO_ZR36120 driver

2006-11-27 Thread Joe Feise
Adrian Bunk wrote on 11/27/06 22:07: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 09:30:27PM -0800, Joe Feise wrote: >> Adrian Bunk wrote on 11/25/06 11:15: >> >>> The VIDEO_ZR36120 driver has: >>> - already been marked as BROKEN in 2.6.0 three years ago and >>> - is still marked as BROKEN. >>> >>> Drivers that had

Re: [2.6 patch] remove the broken VIDEO_ZR36120 driver

2006-11-27 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 09:30:27PM -0800, Joe Feise wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote on 11/25/06 11:15: > > > The VIDEO_ZR36120 driver has: > > - already been marked as BROKEN in 2.6.0 three years ago and > > - is still marked as BROKEN. > > > > Drivers that had been marked as BROKEN for such a long ti

Re: [2.6 patch] remove the broken VIDEO_ZR36120 driver

2006-11-27 Thread Joe Feise
Adrian Bunk wrote on 11/25/06 11:15: > The VIDEO_ZR36120 driver has: > - already been marked as BROKEN in 2.6.0 three years ago and > - is still marked as BROKEN. > > Drivers that had been marked as BROKEN for such a long time seem to be > unlikely to be revived in the forseeable future. > > Bu

Re: [2.6 patch] remove the broken VIDEO_ZR36120 driver

2006-11-26 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Em Sáb, 2006-11-25 às 20:15 +0100, Adrian Bunk escreveu: > The VIDEO_ZR36120 driver has: > - already been marked as BROKEN in 2.6.0 three years ago and > - is still marked as BROKEN. > > Drivers that had been marked as BROKEN for such a long time seem to be > unlikely to be revived in the forseea

[RFC: 2.6 patch] remove the broken VIDEO_ZR36120 driver

2006-11-17 Thread Adrian Bunk
The VIDEO_ZR36120 driver has: - already been marked as BROKEN in 2.6.0 three years ago and - is still marked as BROKEN. Drivers that had been marked as BROKEN for such a long time seem to be unlikely to be revived in the forseeable future. But if anyone wants to ever revive this driver, the code