Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I have no strong opinion regarding this - if it's agreed upon that it's
> unlikely it will ever grow, I can also send an additional patch
> simplifying it.
I haven't got any response from the original person who submitted this
patch. It isn't clear to me whether this is a
On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 02:05:23PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Instead of cleaning up this mess, please replace this patch with the
> > patch below.
> >
>
> Yeah, I considered that patch as a placeholder; I'd been wondering if it
> can be completely removed.
>
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Instead of cleaning up this mess, please replace this patch with the
> patch below.
>
Yeah, I considered that patch as a placeholder; I'd been wondering if it
can be completely removed.
But this patch looks fine, though I'd go further - the lookup table of
pci ids is
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 01:05:59AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>...
> Changes since 2.6.21-rc5-mm2:
>...
> +x86_64-mm-clean-up-mach_reboot_fixups.patch
>...
> A few x86 updates
>...
OMG - I'll never understand how someone could initially start doing this
hiding of a small fixup behind a config
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 01:05:59AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
...
Changes since 2.6.21-rc5-mm2:
...
+x86_64-mm-clean-up-mach_reboot_fixups.patch
...
A few x86 updates
...
OMG - I'll never understand how someone could initially start doing this
hiding of a small fixup behind a config option.
Adrian Bunk wrote:
Instead of cleaning up this mess, please replace this patch with the
patch below.
Yeah, I considered that patch as a placeholder; I'd been wondering if it
can be completely removed.
But this patch looks fine, though I'd go further - the lookup table of
pci ids is
On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 02:05:23PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Adrian Bunk wrote:
Instead of cleaning up this mess, please replace this patch with the
patch below.
Yeah, I considered that patch as a placeholder; I'd been wondering if it
can be completely removed.
But this
Adrian Bunk wrote:
I have no strong opinion regarding this - if it's agreed upon that it's
unlikely it will ever grow, I can also send an additional patch
simplifying it.
I haven't got any response from the original person who submitted this
patch. It isn't clear to me whether this is a fix
8 matches
Mail list logo