On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 09:34:09AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 15 October 2007, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> > The underlying ABI is not changing, I hope - the trailing padding in the
> > struct should not affect the processing of the data by dm, and I see no
> > reason to continue mainta
On Monday 15 October 2007, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> The underlying ABI is not changing, I hope - the trailing padding in the
> struct should not affect the processing of the data by dm, and I see no
> reason to continue maintaining the fiction that the 32-bit and 64-bit
> ioctls are in some way i
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 12:16:29AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> This change seems rather bogus, you're changing the ABI just to work
> around a bug in the compat_ioctl layer. Why not just do the compat
> code the right way, like the patch below?
The underlying ABI is not changing, I hope - the tr
On Friday 12 October 2007, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> Make size of dm_ioctl struct always 312 bytes on all supported
> architectures.
>
> This change retains compatibility with already-compiled code because
> it uses an embedded offset to locate the payload that follows the
> structure.
>
> On 64
From: Milan Broz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Make size of dm_ioctl struct always 312 bytes on all supported
architectures.
This change retains compatibility with already-compiled code because
it uses an embedded offset to locate the payload that follows the
structure.
On 64-bit architectures there is no
5 matches
Mail list logo