On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:46:12 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On a serious note, it seems that two scatter lists per request leaded
> to this bug. Can the scatter list in struct ub_request be removed?
Good question. It's an eyesore to be sure. The duplication exists
for the
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 23:46:19 -0800
Pete Zaitcev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:05:06 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > http://students.zipernowsky.hu/~oliverp/kernel/regression_2624/
>
> > I think ub.c is basically abandoned in favour of usb-storage.
>
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:46:12 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a serious note, it seems that two scatter lists per request leaded
to this bug. Can the scatter list in struct ub_request be removed?
Good question. It's an eyesore to be sure. The duplication exists
for the sake
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 23:46:19 -0800
Pete Zaitcev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:05:06 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://students.zipernowsky.hu/~oliverp/kernel/regression_2624/
I think ub.c is basically abandoned in favour of usb-storage.
If so,
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:05:06 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > http://students.zipernowsky.hu/~oliverp/kernel/regression_2624/
> I think ub.c is basically abandoned in favour of usb-storage.
> If so, perhaps we should remove or disble ub.c?
Looks like it's just Tomo or Jens
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:05:06 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://students.zipernowsky.hu/~oliverp/kernel/regression_2624/
I think ub.c is basically abandoned in favour of usb-storage.
If so, perhaps we should remove or disble ub.c?
Looks like it's just Tomo or Jens made a
/usr/data/source/git/linux-2.6/drivers/block/ub.c: In function 'ub_end_rq':
/usr/data/source/git/linux-2.6/drivers/block/ub.c:819: error: implicit
declaration of function 'end_that_request_first'
/usr/data/source/git/linux-2.6/drivers/block/ub.c:820: error: implicit
declaration of function
i reverted this commit 7d699bafe258ebd8f9b4ec182c554200b369a504 , and
now compile ...
On 2/5/08, Pete Zaitcev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:05:06 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Looks like you deadlocked in ub_request_fn(). I assume that you were
>
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:05:06 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks like you deadlocked in ub_request_fn(). I assume that you were using
> ub.c in 2.6.23 and that it worked OK? If so, we broke it, possibly via
> changes to the core block layer.
>
> I think ub.c is basically
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 22:48:29 +0100
"Oliver Pinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/5/08, Oliver Pinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://students.zipernowsky.hu/~oliverp/kernel/regression_2624/
> >
> > uploaded:
> > kernel image
> > .config
> > new pictures
> > lspci
> > lsusb
> >
> > -
On 2/5/08, Oliver Pinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://students.zipernowsky.hu/~oliverp/kernel/regression_2624/
>
> uploaded:
> kernel image
> .config
> new pictures
> lspci
> lsusb
>
> -
>
> when read for /dev/uba then crashed the kernel, the read is egal, thet
> dd or mount is ...
>
>
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 21:39 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:31:43 +0100 "Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér)" <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > hi all!
> >
> > in the 2.6.24 become i some soft lockups with usb-phone, when i pluged
> > in the mobile, then the vfs-layer crashed.
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:31:43 +0100 "Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér)" <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > hi all!
> >
> > in the 2.6.24 become i some soft lockups with usb-phone, when i pluged
> > in the mobile, then the vfs-layer crashed. am afternoon
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:31:43 +0100 Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér) [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all!
in the 2.6.24 become i some soft lockups with usb-phone, when i pluged
in the mobile, then the vfs-layer crashed. am afternoon can i the
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 21:39 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:31:43 +0100 Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér) [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all!
in the 2.6.24 become i some soft lockups with usb-phone, when i pluged
in the mobile, then the vfs-layer crashed. am afternoon
On 2/5/08, Oliver Pinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://students.zipernowsky.hu/~oliverp/kernel/regression_2624/
uploaded:
kernel image
.config
new pictures
lspci
lsusb
-
when read for /dev/uba then crashed the kernel, the read is egal, thet
dd or mount is ...
On 2/5/08, Oliver
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 22:48:29 +0100
Oliver Pinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/5/08, Oliver Pinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://students.zipernowsky.hu/~oliverp/kernel/regression_2624/
uploaded:
kernel image
.config
new pictures
lspci
lsusb
-
when read for /dev/uba
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:05:06 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like you deadlocked in ub_request_fn(). I assume that you were using
ub.c in 2.6.23 and that it worked OK? If so, we broke it, possibly via
changes to the core block layer.
I think ub.c is basically abandoned
i reverted this commit 7d699bafe258ebd8f9b4ec182c554200b369a504 , and
now compile ...
On 2/5/08, Pete Zaitcev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:05:06 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Looks like you deadlocked in ub_request_fn(). I assume that you were
using
ub.c
/usr/data/source/git/linux-2.6/drivers/block/ub.c: In function 'ub_end_rq':
/usr/data/source/git/linux-2.6/drivers/block/ub.c:819: error: implicit
declaration of function 'end_that_request_first'
/usr/data/source/git/linux-2.6/drivers/block/ub.c:820: error: implicit
declaration of function
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:31:43 +0100 "Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér)" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi all!
>
> in the 2.6.24 become i some soft lockups with usb-phone, when i pluged
> in the mobile, then the vfs-layer crashed. am afternoon can i the
> .config send, and i bisected the kernel, when
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:31:43 +0100 Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér) [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all!
in the 2.6.24 become i some soft lockups with usb-phone, when i pluged
in the mobile, then the vfs-layer crashed. am afternoon can i the
.config send, and i bisected the kernel, when i have
and so then dmesg ..
--
Thanks,
Oliver
Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset
Linux version 2.6.24-szami2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.2 20061115
(prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)) #2 SMP Sun Jan 27 01:47:58 CET 2008
BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
BIOS-e820: -
hi all!
in the 2.6.24 become i some soft lockups with usb-phone, when i pluged
in the mobile, then the vfs-layer crashed. am afternoon can i the
.config send, and i bisected the kernel, when i have time.
pictures from crash:
http://students.zipernowsky.hu/~oliverp/kernel/regression_2624/
--
hi all!
in the 2.6.24 become i some soft lockups with usb-phone, when i pluged
in the mobile, then the vfs-layer crashed. am afternoon can i the
.config send, and i bisected the kernel, when i have time.
pictures from crash:
http://students.zipernowsky.hu/~oliverp/kernel/regression_2624/
--
and so then dmesg ..
--
Thanks,
Oliver
Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset
Linux version 2.6.24-szami2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.2 20061115
(prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)) #2 SMP Sun Jan 27 01:47:58 CET 2008
BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
BIOS-e820: -
26 matches
Mail list logo