Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS

2008-02-11 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:46:12 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On a serious note, it seems that two scatter lists per request leaded > to this bug. Can the scatter list in struct ub_request be removed? Good question. It's an eyesore to be sure. The duplication exists for the

Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS

2008-02-11 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 23:46:19 -0800 Pete Zaitcev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:05:06 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > http://students.zipernowsky.hu/~oliverp/kernel/regression_2624/ > > > I think ub.c is basically abandoned in favour of usb-storage. >

Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS

2008-02-11 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:46:12 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On a serious note, it seems that two scatter lists per request leaded to this bug. Can the scatter list in struct ub_request be removed? Good question. It's an eyesore to be sure. The duplication exists for the sake

Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS

2008-02-11 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 23:46:19 -0800 Pete Zaitcev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:05:06 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://students.zipernowsky.hu/~oliverp/kernel/regression_2624/ I think ub.c is basically abandoned in favour of usb-storage. If so,

Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS

2008-02-08 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:05:06 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > http://students.zipernowsky.hu/~oliverp/kernel/regression_2624/ > I think ub.c is basically abandoned in favour of usb-storage. > If so, perhaps we should remove or disble ub.c? Looks like it's just Tomo or Jens

Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS

2008-02-08 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:05:06 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://students.zipernowsky.hu/~oliverp/kernel/regression_2624/ I think ub.c is basically abandoned in favour of usb-storage. If so, perhaps we should remove or disble ub.c? Looks like it's just Tomo or Jens made a

Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS

2008-02-05 Thread Oliver Pinter
/usr/data/source/git/linux-2.6/drivers/block/ub.c: In function 'ub_end_rq': /usr/data/source/git/linux-2.6/drivers/block/ub.c:819: error: implicit declaration of function 'end_that_request_first' /usr/data/source/git/linux-2.6/drivers/block/ub.c:820: error: implicit declaration of function

Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS

2008-02-05 Thread Oliver Pinter
i reverted this commit 7d699bafe258ebd8f9b4ec182c554200b369a504 , and now compile ... On 2/5/08, Pete Zaitcev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:05:06 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Looks like you deadlocked in ub_request_fn(). I assume that you were >

Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS

2008-02-05 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:05:06 -0800, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Looks like you deadlocked in ub_request_fn(). I assume that you were using > ub.c in 2.6.23 and that it worked OK? If so, we broke it, possibly via > changes to the core block layer. > > I think ub.c is basically

Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS

2008-02-05 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 22:48:29 +0100 "Oliver Pinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/5/08, Oliver Pinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://students.zipernowsky.hu/~oliverp/kernel/regression_2624/ > > > > uploaded: > > kernel image > > .config > > new pictures > > lspci > > lsusb > > > > -

Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS

2008-02-05 Thread Oliver Pinter
On 2/5/08, Oliver Pinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://students.zipernowsky.hu/~oliverp/kernel/regression_2624/ > > uploaded: > kernel image > .config > new pictures > lspci > lsusb > > - > > when read for /dev/uba then crashed the kernel, the read is egal, thet > dd or mount is ... > >

Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS

2008-02-05 Thread Stephen Smalley
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 21:39 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:31:43 +0100 "Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér)" <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > hi all! > > > > in the 2.6.24 become i some soft lockups with usb-phone, when i pluged > > in the mobile, then the vfs-layer crashed.

Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS

2008-02-05 Thread James Morris
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:31:43 +0100 "Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér)" <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > hi all! > > > > in the 2.6.24 become i some soft lockups with usb-phone, when i pluged > > in the mobile, then the vfs-layer crashed. am afternoon

Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS

2008-02-05 Thread James Morris
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:31:43 +0100 Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi all! in the 2.6.24 become i some soft lockups with usb-phone, when i pluged in the mobile, then the vfs-layer crashed. am afternoon can i the

Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS

2008-02-05 Thread Stephen Smalley
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 21:39 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:31:43 +0100 Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi all! in the 2.6.24 become i some soft lockups with usb-phone, when i pluged in the mobile, then the vfs-layer crashed. am afternoon

Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS

2008-02-05 Thread Oliver Pinter
On 2/5/08, Oliver Pinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://students.zipernowsky.hu/~oliverp/kernel/regression_2624/ uploaded: kernel image .config new pictures lspci lsusb - when read for /dev/uba then crashed the kernel, the read is egal, thet dd or mount is ... On 2/5/08, Oliver

Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS

2008-02-05 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 22:48:29 +0100 Oliver Pinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/5/08, Oliver Pinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://students.zipernowsky.hu/~oliverp/kernel/regression_2624/ uploaded: kernel image .config new pictures lspci lsusb - when read for /dev/uba

Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS

2008-02-05 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:05:06 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks like you deadlocked in ub_request_fn(). I assume that you were using ub.c in 2.6.23 and that it worked OK? If so, we broke it, possibly via changes to the core block layer. I think ub.c is basically abandoned

Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS

2008-02-05 Thread Oliver Pinter
i reverted this commit 7d699bafe258ebd8f9b4ec182c554200b369a504 , and now compile ... On 2/5/08, Pete Zaitcev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:05:06 -0800, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks like you deadlocked in ub_request_fn(). I assume that you were using ub.c

Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS

2008-02-05 Thread Oliver Pinter
/usr/data/source/git/linux-2.6/drivers/block/ub.c: In function 'ub_end_rq': /usr/data/source/git/linux-2.6/drivers/block/ub.c:819: error: implicit declaration of function 'end_that_request_first' /usr/data/source/git/linux-2.6/drivers/block/ub.c:820: error: implicit declaration of function

Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS

2008-02-04 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:31:43 +0100 "Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi all! > > in the 2.6.24 become i some soft lockups with usb-phone, when i pluged > in the mobile, then the vfs-layer crashed. am afternoon can i the > .config send, and i bisected the kernel, when

Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS

2008-02-04 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:31:43 +0100 Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi all! in the 2.6.24 become i some soft lockups with usb-phone, when i pluged in the mobile, then the vfs-layer crashed. am afternoon can i the .config send, and i bisected the kernel, when i have

Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS

2008-01-28 Thread Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér)
and so then dmesg .. -- Thanks, Oliver Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset Linux version 2.6.24-szami2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)) #2 SMP Sun Jan 27 01:47:58 CET 2008 BIOS-provided physical RAM map: BIOS-e820: -

[2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS

2008-01-28 Thread Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér)
hi all! in the 2.6.24 become i some soft lockups with usb-phone, when i pluged in the mobile, then the vfs-layer crashed. am afternoon can i the .config send, and i bisected the kernel, when i have time. pictures from crash: http://students.zipernowsky.hu/~oliverp/kernel/regression_2624/ --

[2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS

2008-01-28 Thread Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér)
hi all! in the 2.6.24 become i some soft lockups with usb-phone, when i pluged in the mobile, then the vfs-layer crashed. am afternoon can i the .config send, and i bisected the kernel, when i have time. pictures from crash: http://students.zipernowsky.hu/~oliverp/kernel/regression_2624/ --

Re: [2.6.24 REGRESSION] BUG: Soft lockup - with VFS

2008-01-28 Thread Oliver Pinter (Pintér Olivér)
and so then dmesg .. -- Thanks, Oliver Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset Linux version 2.6.24-szami2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)) #2 SMP Sun Jan 27 01:47:58 CET 2008 BIOS-provided physical RAM map: BIOS-e820: -