Re: [2.6.25 patch] the planned eepro100 removal

2007-10-26 Thread David Acker
Kok, Auke wrote: Jeff Garzik wrote: Bill Davidsen wrote: Adrian Bunk wrote: This patch contains the planned removal of the eepro100 driver. Are the e100 people satisfied that e100 now handles all known cases? I Nope. There are still e100 work outstanding that means we cannot kill eepro100.

Re: [2.6.25 patch] the planned eepro100 removal

2007-10-25 Thread Kok, Auke
Jeff Garzik wrote: > Bill Davidsen wrote: >> Adrian Bunk wrote: >>> This patch contains the planned removal of the eepro100 driver. >>> >> Are the e100 people satisfied that e100 now handles all known cases? I > > Nope. There are still e100 work outstanding that means we cannot kill > eepro100.

Re: [2.6.25 patch] the planned eepro100 removal

2007-10-25 Thread Jeff Garzik
Bill Davidsen wrote: Adrian Bunk wrote: This patch contains the planned removal of the eepro100 driver. Are the e100 people satisfied that e100 now handles all known cases? I Nope. There are still e100 work outstanding that means we cannot kill eepro100. Jeff - To unsubscribe f

Re: [2.6.25 patch] the planned eepro100 removal

2007-10-25 Thread Bill Davidsen
Adrian Bunk wrote: This patch contains the planned removal of the eepro100 driver. Are the e100 people satisfied that e100 now handles all known cases? I remember that there were corner cases e100 didn't handle, have they all been fixed? -- Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "We have more t