Jeff,
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 21:45 +0800, Jeff Chua wrote:
> On 4/25/07, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > * Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > Subject: suspend to disk hangs (CONFIG_NO_HZ)
> > > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/25/217
> > > >
Jeff,
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 21:45 +0800, Jeff Chua wrote:
On 4/25/07, Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: suspend to disk hangs (CONFIG_NO_HZ)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/25/217
Submitter : Jeff Chua [EMAIL
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 20:33 -0400, Len Brown wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 April 2007 14:08, john stultz wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 04:06 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:49:09 +0200 Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Subject: acpi_pm clocksource loses time
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 14:08, john stultz wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 04:06 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:49:09 +0200 Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
> > >
> > > If you
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 12:31:45PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 11:24:42PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 10:33 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:52:16PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> > > > > And have you tried the
On Wednesday, 25 April 2007 13:06, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:49:09 +0200 Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
> >
> > If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
> >
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 04:06 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:49:09 +0200 Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
> >
> > If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
> >
just found and fixed the bug below in SysRq-T - should be included in
v2.6.21 i think.
-->
Subject: [patch] make SysRq-T show all tasks again
From: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
show_state() (SysRq-T) developed the buggy habbit of not showing
TASK_RUNNING tasks. This
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 11:24:42PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 10:33 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:52:16PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> > > > And have you tried the following settings:
> > > > FB_BACKLIGHT=y
> > > > ACPI_IBM=n
>
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 10:33 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:52:16PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> > > And have you tried the following settings:
> > > FB_BACKLIGHT=y
> > > ACPI_IBM=n
> > > ACPI_VIDEO=n
>
BTW, there was one report where resume from RAM resulted in a
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:52:16PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> > This is really weird, as CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT just selects
> > BACKLIGHT_CLASS and LCD_CLASS, and adds an entry (bl_curve)
> > under /sys/class/backlight/*/.
Yeah, it's puzzling to me too.
> > ACPI_IBM which is set
Dave Jones wrote:
> I think this was due to Jeremy not having CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT=y in his config.
>
No, I enabled it and it still works.
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
Forgot to add Richard, sorry for the double post.
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 21:50 +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 09:01 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:31:02PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 04:06:05AM -0700, Andrew Morton
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 09:01 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:31:02PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 04:06:05AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:49:09 +0200 Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >...
> > > > Subject:
On 4/25/07, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Subject: suspend to disk hangs (CONFIG_NO_HZ)
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/25/217
> > Submitter : Jeff Chua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Status : unknown
>
> That's still
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:31:02PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 04:06:05AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:49:09 +0200 Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >...
> > > Subject: ThinkPad X60: resume no longer works (PCI related?)
> > >
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Subject: suspend to disk hangs (CONFIG_NO_HZ)
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/25/217
> > Submitter : Jeff Chua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Status : unknown
>
> That's still rather a lot of bustage from the timekeeping changes.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 04:06:05AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:49:09 +0200 Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
> > Subject: ThinkPad X60: resume no longer works (PCI related?)
> > workaround: CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT=n
> > References :
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:49:09 +0200 Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
>
> If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
> of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:49:09 +0200 Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 04:06:05AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:49:09 +0200 Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Subject: ThinkPad X60: resume no longer works (PCI related?)
workaround: CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT=n
References :
* Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: suspend to disk hangs (CONFIG_NO_HZ)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/25/217
Submitter : Jeff Chua [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status : unknown
That's still rather a lot of bustage from the timekeeping changes. Is
anything
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:31:02PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 04:06:05AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:49:09 +0200 Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Subject: ThinkPad X60: resume no longer works (PCI related?)
On 4/25/07, Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: suspend to disk hangs (CONFIG_NO_HZ)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/25/217
Submitter : Jeff Chua [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status : unknown
That's still rather a lot of
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 09:01 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:31:02PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 04:06:05AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:49:09 +0200 Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Subject: ThinkPad X60:
Forgot to add Richard, sorry for the double post.
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 21:50 +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 09:01 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 01:31:02PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 04:06:05AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
I think this was due to Jeremy not having CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT=y in his config.
No, I enabled it and it still works.
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:52:16PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
This is really weird, as CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT just selects
BACKLIGHT_CLASS and LCD_CLASS, and adds an entry (bl_curve)
under /sys/class/backlight/*/.
Yeah, it's puzzling to me too.
ACPI_IBM which is set (presumably)
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 10:33 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:52:16PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
And have you tried the following settings:
FB_BACKLIGHT=y
ACPI_IBM=n
ACPI_VIDEO=n
BTW, there was one report where resume from RAM resulted in a screen
full
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 11:24:42PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 10:33 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:52:16PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
And have you tried the following settings:
FB_BACKLIGHT=y
ACPI_IBM=n
just found and fixed the bug below in SysRq-T - should be included in
v2.6.21 i think.
--
Subject: [patch] make SysRq-T show all tasks again
From: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
show_state() (SysRq-T) developed the buggy habbit of not showing
TASK_RUNNING tasks. This
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 04:06 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:49:09 +0200 Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the
On Wednesday, 25 April 2007 13:06, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:49:09 +0200 Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 12:31:45PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 11:24:42PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 10:33 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:52:16PM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
And have you tried the following
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 14:08, john stultz wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 04:06 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:49:09 +0200 Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 20:33 -0400, Len Brown wrote:
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 14:08, john stultz wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 04:06 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:49:09 +0200 Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: acpi_pm clocksource loses time on x86-64
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly
38 matches
Mail list logo
