Tejun Heo a écrit :
> Hello,
>
>
> Due to blacklisting, NCQ
> won't be turned on your drive in future kernels.
>
>
Hello thanks.
I have found on Hitachi website the technical datasheets of my drive
model:
http://www.hitachigst.com/tech/techlib.nsf/techdocs/28DCCB17E0EEC5A086256F4E006E2F5B/$file/
Hello,
Mathieu Bérard wrote:
> [ 15.031823] ata1.00: taskfile_load_raw: (0x1f1-1f7): hex: 10 03 00 00
> 00 a0 ef
Okay, this is interesting. This is Enable Device-Initiated Interface
Power State Transitions. So, after this command is executed the device
will try to transit to partial/slumber S
Tejun Heo a écrit :
> Can you apply the attached patch and report what the kernel says with
> ACPI turned on?
>
>
Hi,
I got this:
[ 13.523816] SCSI subsystem initialized
[ 13.528914] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:1f.2[B] -> GSI 19 (level,
low) -> IRQ 19
[ 14.529383] ahci :00:1f.2: AHCI 0
Tejun Heo a écrit :
> > Mathieu Bérard wrote:
>> >> Jeff Garzik a écrit :
>>> >>> Adrian Bunk wrote:
Subject: NCQ problem with ahci and Hitachi drive
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/178
Submitter : Mathieu Bérard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status
Can you apply the attached patch and report what the kernel says with
ACPI turned on?
--
tejun
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
index 019d8ff..6a27a7f 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
@@ -473,8 +473,8 @@ static void taskfile_
Mathieu Bérard wrote:
> Jeff Garzik a écrit :
>> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>> Subject: NCQ problem with ahci and Hitachi drive
>>> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/178
>>> Submitter : Mathieu Bérard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Status : unknown
>> according to the last message in that threa
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 21:41 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Sat, 10 Mar 2007, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> >
> > With this quirk I got this oops on hibernate (but computer still
> > working)
>
> Well, strictly speaking it's a warning, not an oops per se.
>
> What happens is that the qui
On Sat, 10 Mar 2007, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
>
> With this quirk I got this oops on hibernate (but computer still
> working)
Well, strictly speaking it's a warning, not an oops per se.
What happens is that the quirk wants to do an "ioremap_nocache()", which
allocates memory, and that h
On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 02:09 +0100, Mathieu Bérard wrote:
> Jeff Garzik a écrit :
> > Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >> Subject: NCQ problem with ahci and Hitachi drive
> >> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/178
> >> Submitter : Mathieu Bérard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Status : unknown
> >
>
Jeff Garzik a écrit :
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> Subject: NCQ problem with ahci and Hitachi drive
>> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/178
>> Submitter : Mathieu Bérard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Status : unknown
>
> according to the last message in that thread, it sounds like ACPI and
>
Adrian Bunk wrote:
Subject: NCQ problem with ahci and Hitachi drive
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/178
Submitter : Mathieu Bérard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status : unknown
according to the last message in that thread, it sounds like ACPI and
interrupt problems
Subject:
> Subject: libata: PATA UDMA/100 configured as UDMA/33
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/20/294
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-ide@vger.kernel.org/msg04115.html
> Submitter : Fabio Comolli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Handled-By : Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Status
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 02:50:36AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.21-rc2 compared to 2.6.20
> that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
> Subject: kernels fail to boot with drives on ATIIXP controller
> References : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzi
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.21-rc2 compared to 2.6.20
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering
14 matches
Mail list logo
