Re: [3.10rc6] /proc/dri/0/vma broken on nouveau.

2013-08-28 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 06:35:22AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 09:40:33AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 08:53:35PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 09:49:27PM

Re: [3.10rc6] /proc/dri/0/vma broken on nouveau.

2013-08-28 Thread Dave Airlie
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Dave Jones wrote: > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 09:40:33AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 08:53:35PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 09:49:27PM -0400, David Airlie wrote: > > > > > > > > > Reading /proc/dri/0/vma

Re: [3.10rc6] /proc/dri/0/vma broken on nouveau.

2013-08-28 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 09:40:33AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 08:53:35PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 09:49:27PM -0400, David Airlie wrote: > > > > > > > Reading /proc/dri/0/vma causes bad things to happen on a box with > > nouveau > >

Re: [3.10rc6] /proc/dri/0/vma broken on nouveau.

2013-08-28 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 09:40:33AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 08:53:35PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 09:49:27PM -0400, David Airlie wrote: Reading /proc/dri/0/vma causes bad things to happen on a box with nouveau loaded.

Re: [3.10rc6] /proc/dri/0/vma broken on nouveau.

2013-08-28 Thread Dave Airlie
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 09:40:33AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 08:53:35PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 09:49:27PM -0400, David Airlie wrote: Reading /proc/dri/0/vma

Re: [3.10rc6] /proc/dri/0/vma broken on nouveau.

2013-08-28 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 06:35:22AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 09:40:33AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 08:53:35PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at

Re: [3.10rc6] /proc/dri/0/vma broken on nouveau.

2013-08-05 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 08:53:35PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 09:49:27PM -0400, David Airlie wrote: > > > > > Reading /proc/dri/0/vma causes bad things to happen on a box with nouveau > > > loaded. > > > (Note, no X running on that box) > > > > > > Trace below shows

Re: [3.10rc6] /proc/dri/0/vma broken on nouveau.

2013-08-05 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 08:53:35PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 09:49:27PM -0400, David Airlie wrote: Reading /proc/dri/0/vma causes bad things to happen on a box with nouveau loaded. (Note, no X running on that box) Trace below shows trinity, but I

Re: [3.10rc6] /proc/dri/0/vma broken on nouveau.

2013-07-29 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 09:49:27PM -0400, David Airlie wrote: > > > Reading /proc/dri/0/vma causes bad things to happen on a box with nouveau > > loaded. > > (Note, no X running on that box) > > > > Trace below shows trinity, but I can reproduce it with just cat > > /proc/dri/0/vma > >

Re: [3.10rc6] /proc/dri/0/vma broken on nouveau.

2013-07-29 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 09:49:27PM -0400, David Airlie wrote: Reading /proc/dri/0/vma causes bad things to happen on a box with nouveau loaded. (Note, no X running on that box) Trace below shows trinity, but I can reproduce it with just cat /proc/dri/0/vma How about

Re: [3.10rc6] /proc/dri/0/vma broken on nouveau.

2013-06-17 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 09:49:27PM -0400, David Airlie wrote: > > > Reading /proc/dri/0/vma causes bad things to happen on a box with nouveau > > loaded. > > (Note, no X running on that box) > > > > Trace below shows trinity, but I can reproduce it with just cat > > /proc/dri/0/vma > >

Re: [3.10rc6] /proc/dri/0/vma broken on nouveau.

2013-06-17 Thread David Airlie
> Reading /proc/dri/0/vma causes bad things to happen on a box with nouveau > loaded. > (Note, no X running on that box) > > Trace below shows trinity, but I can reproduce it with just cat > /proc/dri/0/vma How about this, lets just rip it all out. Dave.From

[3.10rc6] /proc/dri/0/vma broken on nouveau.

2013-06-17 Thread Dave Jones
Reading /proc/dri/0/vma causes bad things to happen on a box with nouveau loaded. (Note, no X running on that box) Trace below shows trinity, but I can reproduce it with just cat /proc/dri/0/vma [ cut here ] kernel BUG at arch/x86/mm/physaddr.c:79! invalid opcode:

[3.10rc6] /proc/dri/0/vma broken on nouveau.

2013-06-17 Thread Dave Jones
Reading /proc/dri/0/vma causes bad things to happen on a box with nouveau loaded. (Note, no X running on that box) Trace below shows trinity, but I can reproduce it with just cat /proc/dri/0/vma [ cut here ] kernel BUG at arch/x86/mm/physaddr.c:79! invalid opcode:

Re: [3.10rc6] /proc/dri/0/vma broken on nouveau.

2013-06-17 Thread David Airlie
Reading /proc/dri/0/vma causes bad things to happen on a box with nouveau loaded. (Note, no X running on that box) Trace below shows trinity, but I can reproduce it with just cat /proc/dri/0/vma How about this, lets just rip it all out. Dave.From 54f9605737437272f440bbc6cc4adf805334884b

Re: [3.10rc6] /proc/dri/0/vma broken on nouveau.

2013-06-17 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 09:49:27PM -0400, David Airlie wrote: Reading /proc/dri/0/vma causes bad things to happen on a box with nouveau loaded. (Note, no X running on that box) Trace below shows trinity, but I can reproduce it with just cat /proc/dri/0/vma How about