On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 12:50:00PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> Sorry for not mentioning this earlier, but this patch should really be
> two (or more) patches: one to add dmabarrier support to the core user
> memory stuff in drivers/infiniband, and a second one to add support to
> mthca (and
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 12:50:00PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
Sorry for not mentioning this earlier, but this patch should really be
two (or more) patches: one to add dmabarrier support to the core user
memory stuff in drivers/infiniband, and a second one to add support to
mthca (and more
Sorry for not mentioning this earlier, but this patch should really be
two (or more) patches: one to add dmabarrier support to the core user
memory stuff in drivers/infiniband, and a second one to add support to
mthca (and more patches to add support to mlx4, cxgb3, etc, etc).
> + * @dmabarrier:
Sorry for not mentioning this earlier, but this patch should really be
two (or more) patches: one to add dmabarrier support to the core user
memory stuff in drivers/infiniband, and a second one to add support to
mthca (and more patches to add support to mlx4, cxgb3, etc, etc).
+ * @dmabarrier:
Use the dma_flags_set_dmabarrier() interface to allow a "dmabarrier"
attribute to be associated with user-allocated memory. (For now,
it's only implemented for mthca.)
Signed-off-by: Arthur Kepner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c |7 +--
Use the dma_flags_set_dmabarrier() interface to allow a dmabarrier
attribute to be associated with user-allocated memory. (For now,
it's only implemented for mthca.)
Signed-off-by: Arthur Kepner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c |7 +--
6 matches
Mail list logo
