On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 08:44:43 -0800 (PST) Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> This is just a coding style thing, but I thought I should really point it
> out, because these kinds of things quite often result in nasty bugs simply
> because the source code is so hard to read properly:
>
> On Tue, 6 Mar 2007
Hi!
> > > > Quoting Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > >
> > > > Ok, it does indeed solve the problem for me.
> > >
> > > Not yet for me unfortunately, although this seems to help.
> > > Is this the patch I should have applied?
> > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/5/445
> > >
> > > With this
* Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is just a coding style thing, but I thought I should really point
> it out, because these kinds of things quite often result in nasty bugs
> simply because the source code is so hard to read properly:
yeah, agreed. We'll fix this.
Ing
This is just a coding style thing, but I thought I should really point it
out, because these kinds of things quite often result in nasty bugs simply
because the source code is so hard to read properly:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> -static void hrtimer_switch_to_hres(void)
> +stati
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 13:51 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > BTW, Ingo, can you suspend/resume any number of times with this
> > > > patch?
> > >
> > > well I could at least two times in a row in my minimalistic setup
> > > (config attached) however
* Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > update: this only happens with simulation, and even then it's not a
> > full hang but 'hangs until i hit a key'. With real resume i'm
> > hitting a real key anyway so it doesnt hang.
>
> How 'bout my .config?
your config works fine here too
> Quoting Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: [5/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions
>
> * Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > BTW, Ingo, can you suspend/resume any number of times with this
> > > > patch?
> >
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > BTW, Ingo, can you suspend/resume any number of times with this
> > > patch?
> >
> > well I could at least two times in a row in my minimalistic setup
> > (config attached) however using the full kernel config it still
> > hangs ... (config also a
> Quoting Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: [5/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions
>
>
> * Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Not yet for me unfortunately, although this seems to help.
> > > > Is this the pat
> Quoting Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: [5/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions
>
>
> * Soeren Sonnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > BTW, Ingo, can you suspend/resume any number of times with this
> > > patch?
> &g
On 3/6/07, Soeren Sonnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Not yet for me unfortunately, although this seems to help.
> > > Is this the patch I should have applied?
> > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/5/445
Same problem for me on 2.6.21-rc2/rc1 on IBM X60s. I've applied this
patch and Ingo Mo
* Soeren Sonnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > BTW, Ingo, can you suspend/resume any number of times with this
> > patch?
>
> well I could at least two times in a row in my minimalistic setup
> (config attached) however using the full kernel config it still hangs
> ... (config also attach
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 12:46 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Quoting Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Subject: Re: [5/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions
> >
> >
> > * Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > Qu
> Quoting Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Subject: Re: [5/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions
>
>
> * Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Quoting Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > > Ok, it does indeed
* Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Quoting Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > Ok, it does indeed solve the problem for me.
>
> Not yet for me unfortunately, although this seems to help.
> Is this the patch I should have applied?
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/5/445
>
>
> Quoting Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Ok, it does indeed solve the problem for me.
Not yet for me unfortunately, although this seems to help.
Is this the patch I should have applied?
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/5/445
With this applied, on resume I get *some* screen output soon after r
> Quoting Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Ok, it does indeed solve the problem for me.
Not yet for me unfortunately, although this seems to help.
Is this the patch I should have applied?
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/5/445
With this applied, on resume I get *some* screen output soon after r
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 08:25 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> The programming of periodic tick devices needs to be saved/restored
> across suspend/resume - otherwise we might end up with a system coming
> up that relies on getting a PIT (or HPET) interrupt, while those devices
> default to 'no interru
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 07:49 +0100, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 01:25 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 15:45 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Subject: macbook pro suspend to ram b
* Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Compiling right now - delayed because I just had to pick up one of
> > the kids from gymnastics.
>
> Ok, it does indeed solve the problem for me.
>
> Mind sending a signed-off thing with explanations etc?
here's Thomas' patch with explanations:
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 01:25 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 15:45 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Subject: macbook pro suspend to ram broken (clockevents)
> > > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Compiling right now - delayed because I just had to pick up one of the
> kids from gymnastics.
Ok, it does indeed solve the problem for me.
Mind sending a signed-off thing with explanations etc?
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this li
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> Sure. I fought it all day. Can you please test the patch I sent a couple
> of minutes ago ? Would be great to have your feedback tomorrow morning.
Compiling right now - delayed because I just had to pick up one of the
kids from gymnastics.
> We
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 16:38 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > I'm not done with my bisection, but e9e2cdb4 is among the 28 commits left,
> > so I'm pretty sure I'm hitting the same bug. I'll do a few more bootups to
> > be 100% sure.
>
> Ok, it's in the last six candidates, so yeah, I'm pretty su
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > >
> > > Subject: macbook pro suspend to ram broken (clockevents)
> > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/110
> > > Submitter : Soeren Sonnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Caused-By : Thomas
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 15:45 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > >
> > > Subject: macbook pro suspend to ram broken (clockevents)
> > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/110
> > > Submitter : Soeren Sonnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Cau
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > Subject: macbook pro suspend to ram broken (clockevents)
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/110
> > Submitter : Soeren Sonnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Caused-By : Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > commit
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 02:50 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Subject: ThinkPad T60: system doesn't come out of suspend to RAM
> (CONFIG_NO_HZ)
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/22/391
> Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL P
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 08:57:47AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Subject: i386: no boot with nmi_watchdog=1 (clockevents)
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/21/208
> > Submitter : Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Caused-By : Tho
* Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I used this simple test case given by you a long time ago,
>
> main ()
> {
> iopl(3);
> for (;;)
> asm("cli");
>
> }
>
> This doesn't look like a regression tho, 2.6.19-rc6 has the same
> behavior ..
hm, so this doesnt get detected as a l
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 16:27 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > FYI, this is not a "wont boot" problem, this should be a "NMI
> > > > watchdog does not work" problem - which has far lower severity.
> > > > Also, Thomas did a fix for this which is now
* Bill Davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If a system normally runs a watchdog, and some do, then nmi would be
> forced on by grub.comf and the system would not boot. [...]
uhm, what? The NMI watchdog is totally optional. If it doesnt work, we
print some stuff and just continue with the boo
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Subject: i386: no boot with nmi_watchdog=1 (clockevents)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/21/208
Submitter : Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Caused-By : Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
commit e9e2cdb41
* Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > FYI, this is not a "wont boot" problem, this should be a "NMI
> > > watchdog does not work" problem - which has far lower severity.
> > > Also, Thomas did a fix for this which is now in -mm.
> >
> > yup, you should be able to cross this one off,
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 00:13 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:57:47 +0100 Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > * Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Subject: i386: no boot with nmi_watchdog=1 (clockevents)
> > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/20
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:57:47 +0100 Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Subject: i386: no boot with nmi_watchdog=1 (clockevents)
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/21/208
> > Submitter : Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cau
* Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Subject: i386: no boot with nmi_watchdog=1 (clockevents)
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/21/208
> Submitter : Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Caused-By : Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> commit e9e2cdb412412326c482
This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.21-rc2 compared to 2.6.20
that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering
38 matches
Mail list logo
