On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 5:05 PM Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> On 2/10/19 8:44 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Sun, 2019-02-10 at 10:17 +0100, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> >> On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 7:19 PM James Bottomley
> >> wrote:
> > [...]
> >>> I think the reason for this is that the block mq path
On 2/12/19 8:24 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 19:50 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 2/11/19 7:13 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 09:31 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 2/11/19 9:28 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 08:46 -0700, Jens
On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 19:50 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2/11/19 7:13 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 09:31 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On 2/11/19 9:28 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 08:46 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > > On 2/11/19 8:42 AM,
tomley ; Mikael
> > Pettersson
> > Cc: Linux SPARC Kernel Mailing List ;
> > linux-bl...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> > scsi
> >
> > Subject: Re: [5.0-rc5 regression] "scsi: kill off the legacy IO
> > path"
> >
kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-scsi
>
> Subject: Re: [5.0-rc5 regression] "scsi: kill off the legacy IO path"
> causes 5 minute delay during boot on Sun Blade 2500
...
> > We can either fix this by setting the QUEUE_FLAG_ADD_RANDOM if
> > there's
On 2/11/19 7:13 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 09:31 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 2/11/19 9:28 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 08:46 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 2/11/19 8:42 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 08:28 -0700, Jens
On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 09:31 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2/11/19 9:28 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 08:46 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On 2/11/19 8:42 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 08:28 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > > On 2/11/19 8:25 AM,
On 2/11/19 9:28 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 08:46 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 2/11/19 8:42 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 08:28 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 2/11/19 8:25 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-02-10 at 09:35 -0700, Jens
On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 08:46 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2/11/19 8:42 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 08:28 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On 2/11/19 8:25 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2019-02-10 at 09:35 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > > On 2/10/19 9:25 AM,
On 2/11/19 8:42 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 08:28 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 2/11/19 8:25 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2019-02-10 at 09:35 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 2/10/19 9:25 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-02-10 at 09:05 -0700, Jens
On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 08:28 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2/11/19 8:25 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Sun, 2019-02-10 at 09:35 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On 2/10/19 9:25 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2019-02-10 at 09:05 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > > On 2/10/19 8:44 AM,
On 2/11/19 8:25 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-02-10 at 09:35 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 2/10/19 9:25 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2019-02-10 at 09:05 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 2/10/19 8:44 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-02-10 at 10:17 +0100, Mikael
On Sun, 2019-02-10 at 09:35 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2/10/19 9:25 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Sun, 2019-02-10 at 09:05 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On 2/10/19 8:44 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2019-02-10 at 10:17 +0100, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, Feb 9,
On 2/10/19 9:25 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-02-10 at 09:05 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 2/10/19 8:44 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2019-02-10 at 10:17 +0100, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 7:19 PM James Bottomley
wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
> I
On Sun, 2019-02-10 at 09:05 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 2/10/19 8:44 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Sun, 2019-02-10 at 10:17 +0100, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 7:19 PM James Bottomley
> > > wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> > > > I think the reason for this is that the block
On 2/10/19 8:44 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-02-10 at 10:17 +0100, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 7:19 PM James Bottomley
>> wrote:
> [...]
>>> I think the reason for this is that the block mq path doesn't feed
>>> the kernel entropy pool correctly, hence the need
On Sun, 2019-02-10 at 10:17 +0100, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 7:19 PM James Bottomley
> wrote:
[...]
> > I think the reason for this is that the block mq path doesn't feed
> > the kernel entropy pool correctly, hence the need to install an
> > entropy gatherer for systems
On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 7:19 PM James Bottomley
wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2019-02-09 at 18:04 +0100, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > 4.20 and earlier kernels boot fine on my Sun Blade 2500 (UltraSPARC
> > IIIi), but the 5.0-rc kernels consistently experience a 5 minute
> > delay
> > late during boot, after
On Sat, 2019-02-09 at 18:04 +0100, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> 4.20 and earlier kernels boot fine on my Sun Blade 2500 (UltraSPARC
> IIIi), but the 5.0-rc kernels consistently experience a 5 minute
> delay
> late during boot, after enabling networking but before allowing user
> logins. E.g.
4.20 and earlier kernels boot fine on my Sun Blade 2500 (UltraSPARC
IIIi), but the 5.0-rc kernels consistently experience a 5 minute delay
late during boot, after enabling networking but before allowing user
logins. E.g. 5.0-rc5 dmesg has:
[Fri Feb 8 17:13:17 2019] random: dbus-daemon:
20 matches
Mail list logo
