Hi all,
We are pleased to announce another update of Intel GVT-g for KVM.
Intel GVT-g is a full GPU virtualization solution with mediated pass-through,
starting from 4th generation Intel Core(TM) processors with Intel Graphics
processors. A virtual GPU instance is maintained for each VM, with
Hi all,
We are pleased to announce another update of Intel GVT-g for KVM.
Intel GVT-g is a full GPU virtualization solution with mediated pass-through,
starting from 4th generation Intel Core(TM) processors with Intel Graphics
processors. A virtual GPU instance is maintained for each VM, with
On 11/12/2014 01:33, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> My point is that KVMGT doesn't introduce new requirements as what's
> required in IGD passthrough case, because all the hacks you see now
> is to satisfy guest graphics driver's expectation. I haven't follow up the
> KVM IGD passthrough progress, but if
> From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 12:59 AM
>
> On 09/12/2014 03:49, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > - Now we have XenGT/KVMGT separately maintained, and KVMGT lags
> > behind XenGT regarding to features and qualities. Likely you'll continue
> > see
On 09/12/2014 03:49, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> - Now we have XenGT/KVMGT separately maintained, and KVMGT lags
> behind XenGT regarding to features and qualities. Likely you'll continue
> see stale code (like Xen inst decoder) for some time. In the future we
> plan to maintain a single kernel repo
On 09/12/2014 03:49, Tian, Kevin wrote:
- Now we have XenGT/KVMGT separately maintained, and KVMGT lags
behind XenGT regarding to features and qualities. Likely you'll continue
see stale code (like Xen inst decoder) for some time. In the future we
plan to maintain a single kernel repo for
From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 12:59 AM
On 09/12/2014 03:49, Tian, Kevin wrote:
- Now we have XenGT/KVMGT separately maintained, and KVMGT lags
behind XenGT regarding to features and qualities. Likely you'll continue
see stale code
On 11/12/2014 01:33, Tian, Kevin wrote:
My point is that KVMGT doesn't introduce new requirements as what's
required in IGD passthrough case, because all the hacks you see now
is to satisfy guest graphics driver's expectation. I haven't follow up the
KVM IGD passthrough progress, but if it
> From: Song, Jike
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 2:34 PM
>
> CC Kevin.
>
>
> On 12/09/2014 05:54 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > On 2014-12-04 03:24, Jike Song wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> We are pleased to announce the first release of KVMGT project. KVMGT
> is
> >> the implementation of
CC Kevin.
On 12/09/2014 05:54 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2014-12-04 03:24, Jike Song wrote:
Hi all,
We are pleased to announce the first release of KVMGT project. KVMGT is
the implementation of Intel GVT-g technology, a full GPU virtualization
solution. Under Intel GVT-g, a virtual GPU
CC Kevin.
On 12/09/2014 05:54 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2014-12-04 03:24, Jike Song wrote:
Hi all,
We are pleased to announce the first release of KVMGT project. KVMGT is
the implementation of Intel GVT-g technology, a full GPU virtualization
solution. Under Intel GVT-g, a virtual GPU
On 2014-12-04 03:24, Jike Song wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We are pleased to announce the first release of KVMGT project. KVMGT is
> the implementation of Intel GVT-g technology, a full GPU virtualization
> solution. Under Intel GVT-g, a virtual GPU instance is maintained for
> each VM, with part of
On 2014-12-04 03:24, Jike Song wrote:
Hi all,
We are pleased to announce the first release of KVMGT project. KVMGT is
the implementation of Intel GVT-g technology, a full GPU virtualization
solution. Under Intel GVT-g, a virtual GPU instance is maintained for
each VM, with part of
CC Kevin.
On 12/09/2014 05:54 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2014-12-04 03:24, Jike Song wrote:
Hi all,
We are pleased to announce the first release of KVMGT project. KVMGT is
the implementation of Intel GVT-g technology, a full GPU virtualization
solution. Under Intel GVT-g, a virtual GPU
CC Kevin.
On 12/09/2014 05:54 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2014-12-04 03:24, Jike Song wrote:
Hi all,
We are pleased to announce the first release of KVMGT project. KVMGT is
the implementation of Intel GVT-g technology, a full GPU virtualization
solution. Under Intel GVT-g, a virtual GPU
From: Song, Jike
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 2:34 PM
CC Kevin.
On 12/09/2014 05:54 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2014-12-04 03:24, Jike Song wrote:
Hi all,
We are pleased to announce the first release of KVMGT project. KVMGT
is
the implementation of Intel GVT-g technology,
> From: Daniel Vetter
> Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 6:21 PM
>
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 10:55:01AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > On Sa, 2014-12-06 at 12:17 +0800, Jike Song wrote:
> > > I don't know that is exactly needed, we also need to have Windows
> > > driver considered. However, I'm
Here is some background of this KVMGT release:
- the major purpose is for early experiment of this technique in KVM, and
throw out issues about adding in-kernel device model (or mediated pass-through
framework) in KVM.
- KVMGT shares 90% code as XenGT, regarding to vGPU device model. The
only
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 10:55:01AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Sa, 2014-12-06 at 12:17 +0800, Jike Song wrote:
> > I don't know that is exactly needed, we also need to have Windows
> > driver considered. However, I'm quite confident that, if things gonna
> > work for IGD passthrough, it
On Sa, 2014-12-06 at 12:17 +0800, Jike Song wrote:
> On 12/05/2014 04:50 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > A few comments on the kernel stuff (brief look so far, also
> > compile-tested only, intel gfx on my test machine is too old).
> >
> > * Noticed the kernel bits don't even compile when
On Sa, 2014-12-06 at 12:17 +0800, Jike Song wrote:
On 12/05/2014 04:50 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
A few comments on the kernel stuff (brief look so far, also
compile-tested only, intel gfx on my test machine is too old).
* Noticed the kernel bits don't even compile when configured as
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 10:55:01AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On Sa, 2014-12-06 at 12:17 +0800, Jike Song wrote:
I don't know that is exactly needed, we also need to have Windows
driver considered. However, I'm quite confident that, if things gonna
work for IGD passthrough, it gonna work
Here is some background of this KVMGT release:
- the major purpose is for early experiment of this technique in KVM, and
throw out issues about adding in-kernel device model (or mediated pass-through
framework) in KVM.
- KVMGT shares 90% code as XenGT, regarding to vGPU device model. The
only
From: Daniel Vetter
Sent: Monday, December 08, 2014 6:21 PM
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 10:55:01AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On Sa, 2014-12-06 at 12:17 +0800, Jike Song wrote:
I don't know that is exactly needed, we also need to have Windows
driver considered. However, I'm quite
On 12/05/2014 09:54 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Yeah done a quick read-through of just the i915 bits too, same comment. I
guess this is just the first RFC and the redesign we've discussed about
already with xengt is in progress somewhere?
Yes, it's marching on with Xen now. The KVM implementation
CC Andy :)
On 12/05/2014 09:03 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 05/12/2014 09:50, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
A few comments on the kernel stuff (brief look so far, also
compile-tested only, intel gfx on my test machine is too old).
* Noticed the kernel bits don't even compile when configured as
On 12/05/2014 04:50 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
A few comments on the kernel stuff (brief look so far, also
compile-tested only, intel gfx on my test machine is too old).
* Noticed the kernel bits don't even compile when configured as
module. Everything (vgt, i915, kvm) must be compiled
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 09:50:21AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >
> > https://www.usenix.org/conference/atc14/technical-sessions/presentation/tian
>
> /me goes read this.
>
> A few comments on the kernel stuff (brief look so far, also
> compile-tested only, intel gfx on my test machine is
On 05/12/2014 09:50, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> A few comments on the kernel stuff (brief look so far, also
> compile-tested only, intel gfx on my test machine is too old).
>
> * Noticed the kernel bits don't even compile when configured as
>module. Everything (vgt, i915, kvm) must be
Hi,
> In KVMGT, we need to register an iodev only *after* BAR
> registers are
> written by guest.
Oh, the guest can write the bar register at any time. Typically it
happens at boot only, but it can also happen at runtime, for example on
reboot.
I've also seen the
Hi,
In KVMGT, we need to register an iodev only *after* BAR
registers are
written by guest.
Oh, the guest can write the bar register at any time. Typically it
happens at boot only, but it can also happen at runtime, for example on
reboot.
I've also seen the
On 05/12/2014 09:50, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
A few comments on the kernel stuff (brief look so far, also
compile-tested only, intel gfx on my test machine is too old).
* Noticed the kernel bits don't even compile when configured as
module. Everything (vgt, i915, kvm) must be compiled
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 09:50:21AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
https://www.usenix.org/conference/atc14/technical-sessions/presentation/tian
/me goes read this.
A few comments on the kernel stuff (brief look so far, also
compile-tested only, intel gfx on my test machine is too old).
On 12/05/2014 04:50 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
A few comments on the kernel stuff (brief look so far, also
compile-tested only, intel gfx on my test machine is too old).
* Noticed the kernel bits don't even compile when configured as
module. Everything (vgt, i915, kvm) must be compiled
CC Andy :)
On 12/05/2014 09:03 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 05/12/2014 09:50, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
A few comments on the kernel stuff (brief look so far, also
compile-tested only, intel gfx on my test machine is too old).
* Noticed the kernel bits don't even compile when configured as
On 12/05/2014 09:54 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Yeah done a quick read-through of just the i915 bits too, same comment. I
guess this is just the first RFC and the redesign we've discussed about
already with xengt is in progress somewhere?
Yes, it's marching on with Xen now. The KVM implementation
Hi all,
We are pleased to announce the first release of KVMGT project. KVMGT is the
implementation of Intel GVT-g technology, a full GPU virtualization solution.
Under Intel GVT-g, a virtual GPU instance is maintained for each VM, with part
of performance critical resources directly
Hi all,
We are pleased to announce the first release of KVMGT project. KVMGT is the
implementation of Intel GVT-g technology, a full GPU virtualization solution.
Under Intel GVT-g, a virtual GPU instance is maintained for each VM, with part
of performance critical resources directly
38 matches
Mail list logo
