Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.10.4-rt1

2013-08-12 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Paul Gortmaker | 2013-08-02 10:19:36 [-0400]: >The list of donor victims that aren't used in asm is getting >smaller, but TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG seems OK and it puts RESCHED >and RESCHED_LAZY right beside each other. Applied & merged into the original patch. Thanks. >Thanks guys, >Paul. Sebastian

Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.10.4-rt1

2013-08-02 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 10:19 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > Yep, 3.8 shuffled TIF_MEMDIE to the end of the queue, but > in 3.10, mainline commit 22ecbe8dcef has already done that trick. > > The list of donor victims that aren't used in asm is getting > smaller, but TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG seems OK an

Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.10.4-rt1

2013-08-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
[Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.10.4-rt1] On 02/08/2013 (Fri 14:45) Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 08/02/2013 07:05 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 20:03 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > >> I've added Ben to the CC in case he has a suggestion on > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.10.4-rt1

2013-08-02 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 08/02/2013 07:05 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 20:03 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: >> I've added Ben to the CC in case he has a suggestion on >> how best to fix this, even though it is not yet mainline. > > Can you exchange with a TIF_ that isn't used in asm ? For exa

Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.10.4-rt1

2013-08-01 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 20:03 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > I've added Ben to the CC in case he has a suggestion on > how best to fix this, even though it is not yet mainline. Can you exchange with a TIF_ that isn't used in asm ? For example TIF_PERFMON_* ? Keep all the asm ones below 16 and move u

Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.10.4-rt1

2013-08-01 Thread Paul Gortmaker
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Dear RT folks! > > I'm pleased to announce the 3.10.4-rt1 patch set. > > This is a mostly straight forward port of the 3.8 set. I had > experimented with a new implementation detail, but I did not get it > into a shape which would have made

Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.10.4-rt1

2013-08-01 Thread Felipe Balbi
Hi, On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 01:24:10PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Dear RT folks! > > I'm pleased to announce the 3.10.4-rt1 patch set. > > This is a mostly straight forward port of the 3.8 set. I had > experimented with a new implementation detail, but I did not get it > into a shape which

[ANNOUNCE] 3.10.4-rt1

2013-08-01 Thread Thomas Gleixner
Dear RT folks! I'm pleased to announce the 3.10.4-rt1 patch set. This is a mostly straight forward port of the 3.8 set. I had experimented with a new implementation detail, but I did not get it into a shape which would have made it applicable to RT. Known issues: - SLAB support not workin