On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 10:52:01AM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Looks to me like gcc is objecting to our (ppc64's) _syscall2
> definition; Alan Modra (cc'd) can probably say what we're doing wrong.
I can't spot anything wrong. Take a look at preprocessed source.
--
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs -
Paul Mackerras wrote:
if (__sc_err & 0x1000) \
{ \
errno = __sc_ret; \
__sc_ret = -1;
Andrew Morton writes:
> Marty Ridgeway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The April release of LTP is now on SourceForge.
> >
> > LTP-20050405
>
> It seems to have an x86ism in it which causes the compile to fail on ppc64:
Looks to me like gcc is objecting to our (ppc64's) _syscall2
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 08:05 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> LTP-20050405
> >
> > It seems to have an x86ism in it which causes the compile to fail on ppc64:
> >
> > socketcall01.c: In function `socketcall':
> > socketcall01.c:80: error: asm-specifier for variable `__sc_4'
Andrew Morton wrote:
LTP-20050405
It seems to have an x86ism in it which causes the compile to fail on ppc64:
socketcall01.c: In function `socketcall':
socketcall01.c:80: error: asm-specifier for variable `__sc_4' conflicts with
asm clobber list
That might be a problem with your toolchain.
Other
Marty Ridgeway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The April release of LTP is now on SourceForge.
>
> LTP-20050405
It seems to have an x86ism in it which causes the compile to fail on ppc64:
socketcall01.c: In function `socketcall':
socketcall01.c:80: error: asm-specifier for variable `__sc_4'
Marty Ridgeway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The April release of LTP is now on SourceForge.
LTP-20050405
It seems to have an x86ism in it which causes the compile to fail on ppc64:
socketcall01.c: In function `socketcall':
socketcall01.c:80: error: asm-specifier for variable `__sc_4' conflicts
Andrew Morton wrote:
LTP-20050405
It seems to have an x86ism in it which causes the compile to fail on ppc64:
socketcall01.c: In function `socketcall':
socketcall01.c:80: error: asm-specifier for variable `__sc_4' conflicts with
asm clobber list
That might be a problem with your toolchain.
Other
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 08:05 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
LTP-20050405
It seems to have an x86ism in it which causes the compile to fail on ppc64:
socketcall01.c: In function `socketcall':
socketcall01.c:80: error: asm-specifier for variable `__sc_4' conflicts
with
Andrew Morton writes:
Marty Ridgeway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The April release of LTP is now on SourceForge.
LTP-20050405
It seems to have an x86ism in it which causes the compile to fail on ppc64:
Looks to me like gcc is objecting to our (ppc64's) _syscall2
definition; Alan Modra
Paul Mackerras wrote:
if (__sc_err 0x1000) \
{ \
errno = __sc_ret; \
__sc_ret = -1;
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 10:52:01AM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Looks to me like gcc is objecting to our (ppc64's) _syscall2
definition; Alan Modra (cc'd) can probably say what we're doing wrong.
I can't spot anything wrong. Take a look at preprocessed source.
--
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs -
The April release of LTP is now on SourceForge.
LTP-20050405
- Fixed '-d' option to runltp.sh
- Added optional ltp (fivextra) extended testsuite
- Added digital signiture testcases from the security team
- Applied patch from Gernot Payer to fix, mincore01, shmget02, capset02
- Applied
The April release of LTP is now on SourceForge.
LTP-20050405
- Fixed '-d' option to runltp.sh
- Added optional ltp (fivextra) extended testsuite
- Added digital signiture testcases from the security team
- Applied patch from Gernot Payer to fix, mincore01, shmget02, capset02
- Applied
14 matches
Mail list logo
