On Thursday 17 January 2008, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Jan 17, 2008 1:25 PM, Chris mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So, I've put v0.11 out there. It fixes those two problems and will also
> > compile on older (2.6.18) enterprise kernels.
> >
> > v0.11 does not have any disk format changes.
On Jan 17, 2008 1:25 PM, Chris mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, I've put v0.11 out there. It fixes those two problems and will also
> compile on older (2.6.18) enterprise kernels.
>
> v0.11 does not have any disk format changes.
Hi Chris,
First, massive congratulations for bringing this
On Tuesday 15 January 2008, Chris Mason wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Btrfs v0.10 is now available for download from:
>
> http://oss.oracle.com/projects/btrfs/
Well, it turns out this release had a few small problems:
* data=ordered deadlock on older kernels (including 2.6.23)
* Compile problems
On Tuesday 15 January 2008, Chris Mason wrote:
Hello everyone,
Btrfs v0.10 is now available for download from:
http://oss.oracle.com/projects/btrfs/
Well, it turns out this release had a few small problems:
* data=ordered deadlock on older kernels (including 2.6.23)
* Compile problems when
On Thursday 17 January 2008, Daniel Phillips wrote:
On Jan 17, 2008 1:25 PM, Chris mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, I've put v0.11 out there. It fixes those two problems and will also
compile on older (2.6.18) enterprise kernels.
v0.11 does not have any disk format changes.
Hi Chris,
ons, 16 01 2008 kl. 11:02 +0100, skrev Christian Hesse:
> On Tuesday 15 January 2008, Chris Mason wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > Btrfs v0.10 is now available for download from:
>
> It does not even compile for me, tested with 2.6.24-rc{7,8}. I will look at
> that later.
>
> fs/built-in.o:
On Tuesday 15 January 2008, Chris Mason wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Btrfs v0.10 is now available for download from:
It does not even compile for me, tested with 2.6.24-rc{7,8}. I will look at
that later.
fs/built-in.o: In function `btrfs_xattr_set_acl':
acl.c:(.text+0x68f33): undefined
On Tuesday 15 January 2008, Chris Mason wrote:
Hello everyone,
Btrfs v0.10 is now available for download from:
It does not even compile for me, tested with 2.6.24-rc{7,8}. I will look at
that later.
fs/built-in.o: In function `btrfs_xattr_set_acl':
acl.c:(.text+0x68f33): undefined reference
ons, 16 01 2008 kl. 11:02 +0100, skrev Christian Hesse:
On Tuesday 15 January 2008, Chris Mason wrote:
Hello everyone,
Btrfs v0.10 is now available for download from:
It does not even compile for me, tested with 2.6.24-rc{7,8}. I will look at
that later.
fs/built-in.o: In function
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:52:38AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> http://oss.oracle.com/projects/btrfs/
>
> Btrfs is still in an early alpha state, and the disk format is not finalized.
> v0.10 introduces a new disk format, and is not compatible with v0.9.
>
Looks like fun. btrfsck fails to check
Hello everyone,
Btrfs v0.10 is now available for download from:
http://oss.oracle.com/projects/btrfs/
Btrfs is still in an early alpha state, and the disk format is not finalized.
v0.10 introduces a new disk format, and is not compatible with v0.9.
The core of this release is explicit back
Hello everyone,
Btrfs v0.10 is now available for download from:
http://oss.oracle.com/projects/btrfs/
Btrfs is still in an early alpha state, and the disk format is not finalized.
v0.10 introduces a new disk format, and is not compatible with v0.9.
The core of this release is explicit back
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:52:38AM -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
http://oss.oracle.com/projects/btrfs/
Btrfs is still in an early alpha state, and the disk format is not finalized.
v0.10 introduces a new disk format, and is not compatible with v0.9.
Looks like fun. btrfsck fails to check if it
13 matches
Mail list logo
