On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 07:22:48PM +0200, Pekka Pietikainen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 10:19:58AM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 09:41:21PM -0700, Todd wrote:
> >
> > Sparc servers. The adapters these drivers I posted support are a bi-CMOS
> > implementation of t
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 07:22:48PM +0200, Pekka Pietikainen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 10:19:58AM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 09:41:21PM -0700, Todd wrote:
> >
> > Sparc servers. The adapters these drivers I posted support are a bi-CMOS
> > implementation of t
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 10:19:58AM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 09:41:21PM -0700, Todd wrote:
>
> Sparc servers. The adapters these drivers I posted support are a bi-CMOS
> implementation of the SCI LC3 chipsets, and even though they are
> bi-CMOS, the Link speed on t
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 10:07:07AM -0700, Todd wrote:
> folx,
>
> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> > What numbers does G-Enet provide
> > doing userspace -> userspace transfers, and at what processor
> > overhead?
>
> using stock 2.4 kernel and alteon acenic cards with stock firmware
jeff,
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> On 32 bit PCI, the average we are seeing going userpace -> userspace is
> 120-140 MB/S ranges in those systems that have a PCI bus with
> bridge chipsets that can support these data rates.
>
> That's 2 x G-Enet.
good numbers. not really 2 x Gi
folx,
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
> What numbers does G-Enet provide
> doing userspace -> userspace transfers, and at what processor
> overhead?
using stock 2.4 kernel and alteon acenic cards with stock firmware we're
seeing 993 MBps userspace->userspace (running netperf UDP_STREA
> > 64bit busses should do on the order of 500MB/s.
> > >
> > > the performance numbers that jeff is reporting are not very impressive
> > > even for the slowest PCI bus. we're seeing 993 Mbps (124MB/s) using the
> > > alteon acenic gig-e cards on
rds on 32-bit cards on a 66MHz bus. i would expect
> > to get somewhat slower on a 33MHz bus but not catastrophically so
> > (certainly nothing as slow as 60MB/s or 480Mb/s).
> >
> > what am i misunderstanding here?
> >
> > todd
> >
> > On Mon, 29 J
60MB/s or 480Mb/s).
>
> what am i misunderstanding here?
>
> todd
>
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
>
> > Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 16:49:53 -0700
> > From: Jeff V. Merkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: [EMAIL
700
> From: Jeff V. Merkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Dolphin PCI-SCI RPM Drivers 1.1-4 released
>
>
> Relative to some performance questions folks have asked, the SCI
> adapters are limited by PCI bus speed
Relative to some performance questions folks have asked, the SCI
adapters are limited by PCI bus speeds. If your system supports
64-bit PCI you get much higher numbers. If you have a system
that supports 100+ Megabyte/second PCI throughput, the SCI
adapters will exploit it.
This test was p
Linux Kernel,
The RPM versions of the Dolphin PCI-SCI (Scalable Coherent Interface)
adapter drivers have posted at vger.timpanogas.org/sci. This release
supports the following SCI Adapters, PSB32, PSB64, and PSB66. This
version supports the 32-bit and 64-bit PCI versions of the Dolphin
PCI-
12 matches
Mail list logo
