On 05/03/2018 10:24 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 2018-05-01 10:04:13 [-0500], Grygorii Strashko wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
Hi Grygorii,
Sry, it took some time as i found some instability -
test "stress-ng --class os --all 0 -t 5m " not always finished :(
So, I've tried to rollback to
On 05/03/2018 10:24 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 2018-05-01 10:04:13 [-0500], Grygorii Strashko wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
Hi Grygorii,
Sry, it took some time as i found some instability -
test "stress-ng --class os --all 0 -t 5m " not always finished :(
So, I've tried to rollback to
On 2018-05-01 10:04:13 [-0500], Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
Hi Grygorii,
> Sry, it took some time as i found some instability -
> test "stress-ng --class os --all 0 -t 5m " not always finished :(
> So, I've tried to rollback to v4.14.29-rt25 and use as TI RT kernel as
> pure
On 2018-05-01 10:04:13 [-0500], Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
Hi Grygorii,
> Sry, it took some time as i found some instability -
> test "stress-ng --class os --all 0 -t 5m " not always finished :(
> So, I've tried to rollback to v4.14.29-rt25 and use as TI RT kernel as
> pure
Hi Sebastian,
On 04/23/2018 02:10 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2018-04-23 11:57:39 [-0500], Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> Sry, but I can't apply it. What's you base?
>
> please try this patch and latest v4.14-RT
I've tried this (with v4.14.34-rt27) and I do not see
Hi Sebastian,
On 04/23/2018 02:10 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2018-04-23 11:57:39 [-0500], Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> Sry, but I can't apply it. What's you base?
>
> please try this patch and latest v4.14-RT
I've tried this (with v4.14.34-rt27) and I do not see
On 2018-04-23 11:57:39 [-0500], Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> Sry, but I can't apply it. What's you base?
please try this patch and latest v4.14-RT
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index e305a8f8cd7d..0322503084a5 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++
On 2018-04-23 11:57:39 [-0500], Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> Sry, but I can't apply it. What's you base?
please try this patch and latest v4.14-RT
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index e305a8f8cd7d..0322503084a5 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++
On 04/20/2018 12:11 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 2018-03-27 13:01:07 [-0500], Grygorii Strashko wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
Hi Grygorii,
I've took this RT version and applied "[RT] kernel/time/posix-timer: avoid
schedule()
while holding the RCU lock" [1] on top. Then I run below
On 04/20/2018 12:11 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 2018-03-27 13:01:07 [-0500], Grygorii Strashko wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
Hi Grygorii,
I've took this RT version and applied "[RT] kernel/time/posix-timer: avoid
schedule()
while holding the RCU lock" [1] on top. Then I run below
On 2018-03-27 13:01:07 [-0500], Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
Hi Grygorii,
> I've took this RT version and applied "[RT] kernel/time/posix-timer: avoid
> schedule()
> while holding the RCU lock" [1] on top. Then I run below tests:
…
> no stall or crashes were observed, but I've caught
On 2018-03-27 13:01:07 [-0500], Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
Hi Grygorii,
> I've took this RT version and applied "[RT] kernel/time/posix-timer: avoid
> schedule()
> while holding the RCU lock" [1] on top. Then I run below tests:
…
> no stall or crashes were observed, but I've caught
Hi Sebastian,
On 03/25/2018 05:12 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Dear RT folks!
>
> I'm pleased to announce the v4.14.29-rt25 patch set.
>
> Changes since v4.14.29-rt24:
>
>- There are checks for disabled interrupts in the target code which do
> not work on RT. Reported by
Hi Sebastian,
On 03/25/2018 05:12 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Dear RT folks!
>
> I'm pleased to announce the v4.14.29-rt25 patch set.
>
> Changes since v4.14.29-rt24:
>
>- There are checks for disabled interrupts in the target code which do
> not work on RT. Reported by
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v4.14.29-rt25 patch set.
Changes since v4.14.29-rt24:
- There are checks for disabled interrupts in the target code which do
not work on RT. Reported by Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo.
Known issues
- A warning triggered in
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v4.14.29-rt25 patch set.
Changes since v4.14.29-rt24:
- There are checks for disabled interrupts in the target code which do
not work on RT. Reported by Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo.
Known issues
- A warning triggered in
16 matches
Mail list logo
