On 2020-08-28 09:36:50 [+0200], Daniel Wagner wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 05:50:24PM +0200, Daniel Vacek wrote:
> > Maybe the threshold is 33554432, eg. 32 megs...
>
> I've rearranged the load addresses for the kernel and the dtb and now
> the board is booting again. Starting with a full test
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 05:50:24PM +0200, Daniel Vacek wrote:
> Maybe the threshold is 33554432, eg. 32 megs...
I've rearranged the load addresses for the kernel and the dtb and now
the board is booting again. Starting with a full test run now.
The size list was mainly to see if the v5.9 tree is
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 2:49 PM Daniel Wagner wrote:
>
> > Would be interesting to see the size numbers for v5.6-rt? Hmm, I'll
> > just start the compiler. It's all scripted anyway :)
>
> v5.6-rt:
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 wagi users 28688896 Aug 27 13:38 rpi3-image-ll-v5.6.19-rt12
> -rw-r--r-- 1 wagi user
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 12:28:40PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2020-08-27 12:16:22 [+0200], Daniel Wagner wrote:
> > The -rt kernel is roughly 6MB larger. Just need to check the memory
> > ranges u-boot is using.
>
> so that 6MiB sounded bad but then it is ~36MiB in total so….
> I
> Would be interesting to see the size numbers for v5.6-rt? Hmm, I'll
> just start the compiler. It's all scripted anyway :)
v5.6-rt:
-rw-r--r-- 1 wagi users 28688896 Aug 27 13:38 rpi3-image-ll-v5.6.19-rt12
-rw-r--r-- 1 wagi users 28688896 Aug 27 13:34 rpi3-image-nohz-v5.6.19-rt12
-rw-r--r-- 1 wa
On 2020-08-27 12:16:22 [+0200], Daniel Wagner wrote:
> The -rt kernel is roughly 6MB larger. Just need to check the memory
> ranges u-boot is using.
so that 6MiB sounded bad but then it is ~36MiB in total so….
Is this full debug and so on?
Sebastian
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 11:27:43AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> So v5.9-rc2-rt1 with PREEMPT_RT=y enabled leads to the problem and
> v5.9-rc2-rt1 with PREEMPT_PREEMPT=y boots fine?
Yes. But it must be something with uboot related since it's not the
kernel printing the error message. I
On 2020-08-27 11:19:10 [+0200], Daniel Wagner wrote:
> the the dtb file via ftp and then does a booti. For all non PREEMPT_RT
> kernels (PREEMPT, NONE, SMP=n, ...) everything works fine. For the
> PREEMPT_RT kernel uboot complains with
>
> U-Boot> booti 0x0008 - 0x0260
> bootloader-com
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 12:43:26PM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> All looks good, no crash and all tests do pass on x86_64. Firing up the
> ARM boards now.
All test pass on the BeagleBone Black.
Something is a bit weird with my RPi3 in 64bit mode. uboot loads
the the dtb file via ftp and then does
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:05:18AM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> Yep, this patch helps. The system boots now. I give it a complete test
> run, just to make sure.
All looks good, no crash and all tests do pass on x86_64. Firing up the
ARM boards now.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 10:12:11AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> The RT patch replaced a local-irq-disable with a local-lock which broke.
> I intend to get rid of this local-irq-disable on RT, the local-lock is
> just duct-tape to make it look the same. If this works for everyone then
>
On 2020-08-26 10:08:02 [+0200], Daniel Wagner wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
Hi,
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 05:46:05PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > I'm pleased to announce the v5.9-rc2-rt1 patch set.
>
> I gave it a quick run on my test system. Can't boot the system at this
> point. Didn't
Hi Sebastian,
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 05:46:05PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> I'm pleased to announce the v5.9-rc2-rt1 patch set.
I gave it a quick run on my test system. Can't boot the system at this
point. Didn't look closer at it, maybe it's something obvious...
stack segment: 0
Dear RT folks!
I'm pleased to announce the v5.9-rc2-rt1 patch set.
Changes since v5.6.19-rt12:
- Rebase to v5.9-rc2
- The seqcount related patches have been replaced on top of the
seqcount series by Ahmed S. Darwis which landed mainline.
- The posix-timer patches have been dropped
14 matches
Mail list logo
