Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.9.1-rt19

2020-10-27 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2020-10-27 11:34:11 [+0100], Daniel Wagner wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 11:28:51AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > Is it running as a RT task? > > root@c2d:~/rt-tests# ./pi_stress > Starting PI Stress Test > Number of thread groups: 1 > Duration of test run: infinite > Number

Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.9.1-rt19

2020-10-27 Thread Daniel Wagner
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 11:34:11AM +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote: > It says so, let me double check if those task really run with SCHED_FIFO. I just got an RCU stall without any background load. Anyway, just for completeness here is the ps output: root@c2d:~# ps -eLo

Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.9.1-rt19

2020-10-27 Thread Daniel Wagner
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 11:28:51AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > Is it running as a RT task? root@c2d:~/rt-tests# ./pi_stress Starting PI Stress Test Number of thread groups: 1 Duration of test run: infinite Number of inversions per group: unlimited Admin thread SCHED_FIFO

Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.9.1-rt19

2020-10-27 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2020-10-27 11:25:47 [+0100], Daniel Wagner wrote: > Well, one thing I need to figure out is how to get pi_stress working > correctly on my machines (that is for all -rt trees, so it's nothing > new). It consistently triggers RCU stall warnings with hackbench as > workload. Clark told me the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.9.1-rt19

2020-10-27 Thread Daniel Wagner
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 11:00:49AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2020-10-27 10:36:16 [+0100], Daniel Wagner wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 11:18:38AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > I'm pleased to announce the v5.9.1-rt19 patch set. > > > > FWIW, all tests pass

Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.9.1-rt19

2020-10-27 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2020-10-27 10:36:16 [+0100], Daniel Wagner wrote: > On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 11:18:38AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > I'm pleased to announce the v5.9.1-rt19 patch set. > > FWIW, all tests pass in my lab (by avoiding doing the same stupid > mistake as last time...) glad to hear.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.9.1-rt19

2020-10-27 Thread Daniel Wagner
On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 11:18:38AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > I'm pleased to announce the v5.9.1-rt19 patch set. FWIW, all tests pass in my lab (by avoiding doing the same stupid mistake as last time...)

[ANNOUNCE] v5.9.1-rt19

2020-10-24 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Dear RT folks! I'm pleased to announce the v5.9.1-rt19 patch set. Changes since v5.9.1-rt18: - Mike Galbraith reported a possible circular locking dependency with a seqcount. Backported a patch from upstream solving the issue. - David Runge reported a crash in the block layer. -