Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] pre-patch-2.0.39final

2000-09-15 Thread David Weinehall
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > too loudly about pre8, so it can't be that bad. Oh, and don't bicker > > and argue about the devfs files. It's not devfs itself, only headers. > > Whine bicker bitch moan complain ;) > > I'll go over it in detail early next week You know, one thing that

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] pre-patch-2.0.39final

2000-09-15 Thread Alan Cox
> too loudly about pre8, so it can't be that bad. Oh, and don't bicker > and argue about the devfs files. It's not devfs itself, only headers. Whine bicker bitch moan complain ;) I'll go over it in detail early next week - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"

[ANNOUNCEMENT] pre-patch-2.0.39final

2000-09-15 Thread David Weinehall
Haha! This is final 2.0.39, whether you like it or not! Noone screamed too loudly about pre8, so it can't be that bad. Oh, and don't bicker and argue about the devfs files. It's not devfs itself, only headers. They won't disturb your kernel one bit. They might simplify backporting of drivers, thou