On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 05:25:12PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 05:52:02PM +0200, Anton Arapov wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:39:39AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 05:16:43PM +0200, Anton Arapov wrote:
> > > > > Why not just do that
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 05:25:12PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 05:52:02PM +0200, Anton Arapov wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:39:39AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 05:16:43PM +0200, Anton Arapov wrote:
Why not just do that through email?
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 04:02:28PM -0400, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> On 08/22/2013 06:35 AM, Anton Arapov wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Thank you for contacting me. I will cross-post this to LKML, as there
> > is an information that might be interested for other folks.
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at
On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 04:02:28PM -0400, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
On 08/22/2013 06:35 AM, Anton Arapov wrote:
Hello,
Thank you for contacting me. I will cross-post this to LKML, as there
is an information that might be interested for other folks.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:31:21PM
On 08/22/2013 06:35 AM, Anton Arapov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for contacting me. I will cross-post this to LKML, as there
> is an information that might be interested for other folks.
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:31:21PM +0200, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>> We, the Gentoo Kernel Project Team at
On 08/22/2013 06:35 AM, Anton Arapov wrote:
Hello,
Thank you for contacting me. I will cross-post this to LKML, as there
is an information that might be interested for other folks.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:31:21PM +0200, Tom Wijsman wrote:
We, the Gentoo Kernel Project Team at Gentoo
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 09:43:57PM +0200, Francois Romieu wrote:
> Anton Arapov :
> [...]
> > Oh well,... I didn't have a time for this right now, nor project is
> > not exactly in the state I'm willing to show (mostly webui)
>
> I have sorted the r8169 oopses by kernel revision to start with
Hello,
Thank you for contacting me. I will cross-post this to LKML, as there
is an information that might be interested for other folks.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:31:21PM +0200, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> We, the Gentoo Kernel Project Team at Gentoo Linux, might be interested
> to contribute oopses
Hello,
Thank you for contacting me. I will cross-post this to LKML, as there
is an information that might be interested for other folks.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:31:21PM +0200, Tom Wijsman wrote:
We, the Gentoo Kernel Project Team at Gentoo Linux, might be interested
to contribute oopses to
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 09:43:57PM +0200, Francois Romieu wrote:
Anton Arapov an...@redhat.com :
[...]
Oh well,... I didn't have a time for this right now, nor project is
not exactly in the state I'm willing to show (mostly webui)
I have sorted the r8169 oopses by kernel revision to
Anton Arapov :
[...]
> Oh well,... I didn't have a time for this right now, nor project is
> not exactly in the state I'm willing to show (mostly webui)
I have sorted the r8169 oopses by kernel revision to start with the most
recent kernels. I don't get why the r8169 driver appears in the
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 08:37:48AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> abrt used to have a free-form entry like this. What happened is users
> have no idea what to type in there, so you end up with bugs containing
> things like "don't know" or worse, some crazy moon language you can't
> even read.
Prepend
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 08:37:48AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
abrt used to have a free-form entry like this. What happened is users
have no idea what to type in there, so you end up with bugs containing
things like don't know or worse, some crazy moon language you can't
even read.
Prepend the
Anton Arapov an...@redhat.com :
[...]
Oh well,... I didn't have a time for this right now, nor project is
not exactly in the state I'm willing to show (mostly webui)
I have sorted the r8169 oopses by kernel revision to start with the most
recent kernels. I don't get why the r8169 driver
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 09:58:12PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 08:20:04AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> [...]
> > This is a much more minor nit, but the source code links (like clicking
> > on bad_page from here:
> >
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 08:20:04AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
[...]
> This is a much more minor nit, but the source code links (like clicking
> on bad_page from here:
> https://oops.kernel.org/browse-reports/oops-detail/?id=30565#) from the
> traces for the distribution kernels link over to
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 05:25:12PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 05:52:02PM +0200, Anton Arapov wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:39:39AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 05:16:43PM +0200, Anton Arapov wrote:
> > > > > Why not just do that
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 08:20:04AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 08/19/2013 02:25 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> > * This bug last seen: 2013-08-17
> > Also useful here would be something like:
> > Seen on: 3.2-rc2, 3.10-rc10 (You can probably just list earliest/latest
> > rather than
> >every
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 08:20:04AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 08/19/2013 02:25 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> > * This bug last seen: 2013-08-17
> > Also useful here would be something like:
> > Seen on: 3.2-rc2, 3.10-rc10 (You can probably just list earliest/latest
> > rather than
> >every
On 08/19/2013 02:25 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> * This bug last seen: 2013-08-17
> Also useful here would be something like:
> Seen on: 3.2-rc2, 3.10-rc10 (You can probably just list earliest/latest
> rather than
>every single kernel it's been seen on, unless you want a 'show all' button)
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 08:37:48AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:22:16AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:02:43AM +0200, Anton Arapov wrote:
> > > > * Visiting it with chromium gets an annoying warning about the https
> server
> > > > ...
>
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:22:16AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:02:43AM +0200, Anton Arapov wrote:
> > > * Visiting it with chromium gets an annoying warning about the https
> > > server
> > > ...
> > [snip]
> > > ...
> > > Dave
> >
> > Thanks, Dave! Will
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:02:43AM +0200, Anton Arapov wrote:
> > * Visiting it with chromium gets an annoying warning about the https server
> > ...
> [snip]
> > ...
> > Dave
>
> Thanks, Dave! Will be fixed and improved.
Yeah, collecting oopses is a good idea, so +1.
However, we probably
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 05:25:12PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 05:52:02PM +0200, Anton Arapov wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:39:39AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 05:16:43PM +0200, Anton Arapov wrote:
> > > > > Why not just do that
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 05:25:12PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 05:52:02PM +0200, Anton Arapov wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:39:39AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 05:16:43PM +0200, Anton Arapov wrote:
Why not just do that through email?
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:02:43AM +0200, Anton Arapov wrote:
* Visiting it with chromium gets an annoying warning about the https server
...
[snip]
...
Dave
Thanks, Dave! Will be fixed and improved.
Yeah, collecting oopses is a good idea, so +1.
However, we probably want to
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:22:16AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:02:43AM +0200, Anton Arapov wrote:
* Visiting it with chromium gets an annoying warning about the https
server
...
[snip]
...
Dave
Thanks, Dave! Will be fixed and improved.
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 08:37:48AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:22:16AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:02:43AM +0200, Anton Arapov wrote:
* Visiting it with chromium gets an annoying warning about the https
server
...
[snip]
On 08/19/2013 02:25 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
* This bug last seen: 2013-08-17
Also useful here would be something like:
Seen on: 3.2-rc2, 3.10-rc10 (You can probably just list earliest/latest
rather than
every single kernel it's been seen on, unless you want a 'show all' button)
Once
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 08:20:04AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
On 08/19/2013 02:25 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
* This bug last seen: 2013-08-17
Also useful here would be something like:
Seen on: 3.2-rc2, 3.10-rc10 (You can probably just list earliest/latest
rather than
every single
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 08:20:04AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
On 08/19/2013 02:25 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
* This bug last seen: 2013-08-17
Also useful here would be something like:
Seen on: 3.2-rc2, 3.10-rc10 (You can probably just list earliest/latest
rather than
every single
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 05:25:12PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 05:52:02PM +0200, Anton Arapov wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:39:39AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 05:16:43PM +0200, Anton Arapov wrote:
Why not just do that through email?
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 08:20:04AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
[...]
This is a much more minor nit, but the source code links (like clicking
on bad_page from here:
https://oops.kernel.org/browse-reports/oops-detail/?id=30565#) from the
traces for the distribution kernels link over to mainline
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 09:58:12PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 08:20:04AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
[...]
This is a much more minor nit, but the source code links (like clicking
on bad_page from here:
https://oops.kernel.org/browse-reports/oops-detail/?id=30565#)
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 05:52:02PM +0200, Anton Arapov wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:39:39AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 05:16:43PM +0200, Anton Arapov wrote:
> > > > Why not just do that through email? You'll reach a much wider group of
> > > > people than
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:39:39AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 05:16:43PM +0200, Anton Arapov wrote:
> > > Why not just do that through email? You'll reach a much wider group of
> > > people than the tiny 80 developers at the conference.
> >
> > Ouch! Someone to take it
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:39:39AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 05:16:43PM +0200, Anton Arapov wrote:
Why not just do that through email? You'll reach a much wider group of
people than the tiny 80 developers at the conference.
Ouch! Someone to take it as
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 05:52:02PM +0200, Anton Arapov wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:39:39AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 05:16:43PM +0200, Anton Arapov wrote:
Why not just do that through email? You'll reach a much wider group of
people than the tiny 80
38 matches
Mail list logo
