Re: [BISECTED REGRESSION] ath9k: Fix general protection fault in ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb

2020-06-22 Thread Kalle Valo
Roman Mamedov writes: > On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 12:18:38 +0800 > Qiujun Huang wrote: > >> In ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb interface number is assumed to be 0. >> usb_ifnum_to_if(urb->dev, 0) >> But it isn't always true. >> >> The case reported by syzbot: >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/666c

[BISECTED REGRESSION] ath9k: Fix general protection fault in ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb

2020-06-20 Thread Roman Mamedov
On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 12:18:38 +0800 Qiujun Huang wrote: > In ath9k_hif_usb_rx_cb interface number is assumed to be 0. > usb_ifnum_to_if(urb->dev, 0) > But it isn't always true. > > The case reported by syzbot: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/666c9c05a1c05...@google.com > usb 2-1: