Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> Agree it needs fixing, but I actually think the rx-offset stuff is more
> urgent than this. For the future, it would be useful for both of us to
> have separate r8169-fixes and r8169-cleanups queues.
Do you have a synonym/pointer for the rx-offset stuff
Any chance to convince the alien who took control of Jeff's libata queue to
push:
r8169: synchronization and balancing when the device is closed
(1.1982.1.58 ?)
Test case on current 2.6.11-rc4:
- ifconfig ethX 10.0.0.1 up
- ifconfig ethX down
- ifconfig ethX 10.0.0.1 up
-> Rx does not work any mo
2 matches
Mail list logo
