Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-git6 soft lockup detected while running libhugetlbfs

2008-02-04 Thread Kamalesh Babulal
Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The CONFIG_NO_HZ is not set and the system seems not be truly locked >> up ,btw wc -l of the softlockup messages is around 108 times, while >> running the libhugetlbfs only and this is reproducible with the >> 2.6.24-git7

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-git6 soft lockup detected while running libhugetlbfs

2008-02-04 Thread Kamalesh Babulal
Ingo Molnar wrote: * Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The CONFIG_NO_HZ is not set and the system seems not be truly locked up ,btw wc -l of the softlockup messages is around 108 times, while running the libhugetlbfs only and this is reproducible with the 2.6.24-git7 also.

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-git6 soft lockup detected while running libhugetlbfs

2008-02-01 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The CONFIG_NO_HZ is not set and the system seems not be truly locked > up ,btw wc -l of the softlockup messages is around 108 times, while > running the libhugetlbfs only and this is reproducible with the > 2.6.24-git7 also. Peter just fixed a

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-git6 soft lockup detected while running libhugetlbfs

2008-02-01 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The CONFIG_NO_HZ is not set and the system seems not be truly locked up ,btw wc -l of the softlockup messages is around 108 times, while running the libhugetlbfs only and this is reproducible with the 2.6.24-git7 also. Peter just fixed a

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-git6 soft lockup detected while running libhugetlbfs

2008-01-30 Thread Kamalesh Babulal
Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Softlockup is detected while running libhugetlbfs on the 2.6.24-git6 >> kernel. The machine is a Pentium III (Cascades) 16 cpu machine. >> >> BUG: soft lockup - CPU#13 stuck for 61s! [swapper:0] > > is nohz enabled? And the

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-git6 soft lockup detected while running libhugetlbfs

2008-01-30 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Softlockup is detected while running libhugetlbfs on the 2.6.24-git6 > kernel. The machine is a Pentium III (Cascades) 16 cpu machine. > > BUG: soft lockup - CPU#13 stuck for 61s! [swapper:0] is nohz enabled? And the system did not truly lock

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-git6 soft lockup detected while running libhugetlbfs

2008-01-30 Thread Kamalesh Babulal
Ingo Molnar wrote: * Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Softlockup is detected while running libhugetlbfs on the 2.6.24-git6 kernel. The machine is a Pentium III (Cascades) 16 cpu machine. BUG: soft lockup - CPU#13 stuck for 61s! [swapper:0] is nohz enabled? And the system did

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-git6 soft lockup detected while running libhugetlbfs

2008-01-30 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Softlockup is detected while running libhugetlbfs on the 2.6.24-git6 kernel. The machine is a Pentium III (Cascades) 16 cpu machine. BUG: soft lockup - CPU#13 stuck for 61s! [swapper:0] is nohz enabled? And the system did not truly lock up,

[BUG] 2.6.24-git6 soft lockup detected while running libhugetlbfs

2008-01-29 Thread Kamalesh Babulal
Hi, Softlockup is detected while running libhugetlbfs on the 2.6.24-git6 kernel. The machine is a Pentium III (Cascades) 16 cpu machine. BUG: soft lockup - CPU#13 stuck for 61s! [swapper:0] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted (2.6.24-git6-autokern1 #1) EIP: 0060:[] EFLAGS: 0246 CPU: 13 EIP is

[BUG] 2.6.24-git6 soft lockup detected while running libhugetlbfs

2008-01-29 Thread Kamalesh Babulal
Hi, Softlockup is detected while running libhugetlbfs on the 2.6.24-git6 kernel. The machine is a Pentium III (Cascades) 16 cpu machine. BUG: soft lockup - CPU#13 stuck for 61s! [swapper:0] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted (2.6.24-git6-autokern1 #1) EIP: 0060:[c1000328] EFLAGS: 0246 CPU: