On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:04:40 +0300
Oleg Nesterov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, please look at http://marc.info/?t=12030984056
>
> Btw. The bug in tty_io.c _can_ explain this trace, but it would be nice
> to ensure we don't have other problems. Could you try this
>
>
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:34:17 -0500
Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:40:33 +0530
> Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [ 25.512919] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 9d74e37b
> > [ 25.514926] IP: [] proc_flush_task+0x5b/0x223
>
> I
On 02/20, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:40:33 +0530
> Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [ 25.512919] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 9d74e37b
> > [ 25.514926] IP: [] proc_flush_task+0x5b/0x223
>
> I wonder if this one is related. Also with
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:40:33 +0530
Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ 25.512919] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 9d74e37b
> [ 25.514926] IP: [] proc_flush_task+0x5b/0x223
I wonder if this one is related. Also with 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 on x86_64:
BUG: unable to handle
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:40:33 +0530
Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ 25.512919] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 9d74e37b
[ 25.514926] IP: [c04a8fac] proc_flush_task+0x5b/0x223
I wonder if this one is related. Also with 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 on x86_64:
BUG: unable to
On 02/20, Rik van Riel wrote:
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:40:33 +0530
Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ 25.512919] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 9d74e37b
[ 25.514926] IP: [c04a8fac] proc_flush_task+0x5b/0x223
I wonder if this one is related. Also with
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:34:17 -0500
Rik van Riel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:40:33 +0530
Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ 25.512919] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 9d74e37b
[ 25.514926] IP: [c04a8fac] proc_flush_task+0x5b/0x223
I wonder
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:04:40 +0300
Oleg Nesterov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, please look at http://marc.info/?t=12030984056
Btw. The bug in tty_io.c _can_ explain this trace, but it would be nice
to ensure we don't have other problems. Could you try this
On 02/17, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
>
> There has been discussion on the patch for this panic on
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/16/99
This looks similar...
> [ 25.512919] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 9d74e37b
> [ 25.514926] IP: [] proc_flush_task+0x5b/0x223
> [ 25.516934]
On 02/17, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
There has been discussion on the patch for this panic on
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/16/99
This looks similar...
[ 25.512919] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 9d74e37b
[ 25.514926] IP: [c04a8fac] proc_flush_task+0x5b/0x223
[
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:40:33 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> The signals-do_signal_stop-use-signal_group_exit.patch is causing the
>> kernel panic, while booting in to the 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 kernel on x86.
>>
>> There has been discussion
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:40:33 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> The signals-do_signal_stop-use-signal_group_exit.patch is causing the
> kernel panic, while booting in to the 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 kernel on x86.
>
> There has been discussion on the patch for this panic
Hi Andrew,
The signals-do_signal_stop-use-signal_group_exit.patch is causing the
kernel panic, while booting in to the 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 kernel on x86.
There has been discussion on the patch for this panic on
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/16/99
[ 25.512919] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging
Hi Andrew,
The signals-do_signal_stop-use-signal_group_exit.patch is causing the
kernel panic, while booting in to the 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 kernel on x86.
There has been discussion on the patch for this panic on
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/16/99
[ 25.512919] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:40:33 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Andrew,
The signals-do_signal_stop-use-signal_group_exit.patch is causing the
kernel panic, while booting in to the 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 kernel on x86.
There has been discussion on the patch for this panic on
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:40:33 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Andrew,
The signals-do_signal_stop-use-signal_group_exit.patch is causing the
kernel panic, while booting in to the 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 kernel on x86.
There has been discussion on the patch for
16 matches
Mail list logo