BTW, isn't this a similar to what should happen with the block io cgroup?
What is the behavior with a fd writing to a file in the scenario you
describe above?
>>>
>>> It forbids task moving in this case:
>>>
>>> /*
>>> * We cannot support shared io contexts, as we have no mean
On 23.01.2013 01:02, John Fastabend wrote:
[...]
OK, I guess we should do something similar in the netprio, netcls
cgroups and
yes document it as you noted in your last comment.
Here is my attempt to add such a check. I really don't know if this is
the
correct way to do so. To test this I ha
[...]
OK, I guess we should do something similar in the netprio, netcls
cgroups and
yes document it as you noted in your last comment.
Here is my attempt to add such a check. I really don't know if this is the
correct way to do so. To test this I have written a test program, which
seems to te
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 09:18:38AM -0800, John Fastabend wrote:
> On 01/21/2013 01:57 AM, Li Zefan wrote:
> > On 2013/1/21 17:27, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> >> On 21.01.2013 10:01, Li Zefan wrote:
> >>> On 2013/1/21 16:50, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> Hi Li,
>
> On 21.01.2013 07:08, Li Zefan w
On 01/21/2013 01:57 AM, Li Zefan wrote:
> On 2013/1/21 17:27, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>> On 21.01.2013 10:01, Li Zefan wrote:
>>> On 2013/1/21 16:50, Daniel Wagner wrote:
Hi Li,
On 21.01.2013 07:08, Li Zefan wrote:
> I'm not a network developer, so correct me if I'm wrong.
>
>>>
On 2013/1/21 17:27, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> On 21.01.2013 10:01, Li Zefan wrote:
>> On 2013/1/21 16:50, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>>> Hi Li,
>>>
>>> On 21.01.2013 07:08, Li Zefan wrote:
I'm not a network developer, so correct me if I'm wrong.
Since commit 7955490f732c2b8
("net: netpri
On 2013/1/21 17:21, John Fastabend wrote:
> On 01/21/2013 01:01 AM, Li Zefan wrote:
>> On 2013/1/21 16:50, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>>> Hi Li,
>>>
>>> On 21.01.2013 07:08, Li Zefan wrote:
I'm not a network developer, so correct me if I'm wrong.
Since commit 7955490f732c2b8
("net: ne
On 21.01.2013 10:01, Li Zefan wrote:
> On 2013/1/21 16:50, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>> Hi Li,
>>
>> On 21.01.2013 07:08, Li Zefan wrote:
>>> I'm not a network developer, so correct me if I'm wrong.
>>>
>>> Since commit 7955490f732c2b8
>>> ("net: netprio_cgroup: rework update socket logic"),
>>> sock->
On 01/21/2013 01:01 AM, Li Zefan wrote:
> On 2013/1/21 16:50, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>> Hi Li,
>>
>> On 21.01.2013 07:08, Li Zefan wrote:
>>> I'm not a network developer, so correct me if I'm wrong.
>>>
>>> Since commit 7955490f732c2b8
>>> ("net: netprio_cgroup: rework update socket logic"),
>>> soc
On 2013/1/21 16:50, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> Hi Li,
>
> On 21.01.2013 07:08, Li Zefan wrote:
>> I'm not a network developer, so correct me if I'm wrong.
>>
>> Since commit 7955490f732c2b8
>> ("net: netprio_cgroup: rework update socket logic"),
>> sock->sk->sk_cgrp_prioidx
>> is set when the socket
Hi Li,
On 21.01.2013 07:08, Li Zefan wrote:
> I'm not a network developer, so correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> Since commit 7955490f732c2b8
> ("net: netprio_cgroup: rework update socket logic"), sock->sk->sk_cgrp_prioidx
> is set when the socket is created, and won't be updated unless the task is
> m
I'm not a network developer, so correct me if I'm wrong.
Since commit 406a3c638ce8b17d9704052c07955490f732c2b8
("net: netprio_cgroup: rework update socket logic"), sock->sk->sk_cgrp_prioidx
is set when the socket is created, and won't be updated unless the task is
moved to another cgroup.
Now the
12 matches
Mail list logo
