> >
> > Actually, why not just replace patch-kernel with ketchup?
> >
> > Matt, is that ok with you?
>
> Yes. There are a handful of cleanups that I should do first though.
Please make one of those a better help.
It should be obvious that ketchup 2.6-mm fetch newest -mm
At least in my current
>
> OK - should patch-kernel be deprecated?
> Should ketchup go in scripts/
When Matt's send me an updated ketchup I will add it to scripts and
delete patch-kernel.
Well it may be named patch-kernel in scripts/.
Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:25:46AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 04:15:54PM +, David Greaves wrote:
> > Old thread (!) but this is the last time I could find patch-kernel updated.
>
> Why not just use ketchup instead?
Actually, why not just replace patch-kernel with
Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 04:15:54PM +, David Greaves wrote:
Old thread (!) but this is the last time I could find patch-kernel updated.
Why not just use ketchup instead?
OK - should patch-kernel be deprecated?
Should ketchup go in scripts/
David
-
To unsubscribe from
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 09:44:24AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:25:46AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 04:15:54PM +, David Greaves wrote:
> > > Old thread (!) but this is the last time I could find patch-kernel
> > > updated.
> >
> > Why not just use
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 04:15:54PM +, David Greaves wrote:
> Old thread (!) but this is the last time I could find patch-kernel updated.
Why not just use ketchup instead?
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Old thread (!) but this is the last time I could find patch-kernel updated.
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 01:57:51PM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
Update 'scripts/patch-kernel' to support EXTRAVERSION.
I saw no complains, so applied.
FYI
$ ./scripts/patch-kernel .
Old thread (!) but this is the last time I could find patch-kernel updated.
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 01:57:51PM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
Update 'scripts/patch-kernel' to support EXTRAVERSION.
I saw no complains, so applied.
FYI
$ ./scripts/patch-kernel .
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 04:15:54PM +, David Greaves wrote:
Old thread (!) but this is the last time I could find patch-kernel updated.
Why not just use ketchup instead?
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 09:44:24AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:25:46AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 04:15:54PM +, David Greaves wrote:
Old thread (!) but this is the last time I could find patch-kernel
updated.
Why not just use ketchup
Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 04:15:54PM +, David Greaves wrote:
Old thread (!) but this is the last time I could find patch-kernel updated.
Why not just use ketchup instead?
OK - should patch-kernel be deprecated?
Should ketchup go in scripts/
David
-
To unsubscribe from
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:25:46AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 04:15:54PM +, David Greaves wrote:
Old thread (!) but this is the last time I could find patch-kernel updated.
Why not just use ketchup instead?
Actually, why not just replace patch-kernel with ketchup?
OK - should patch-kernel be deprecated?
Should ketchup go in scripts/
When Matt's send me an updated ketchup I will add it to scripts and
delete patch-kernel.
Well it may be named patch-kernel in scripts/.
Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
Actually, why not just replace patch-kernel with ketchup?
Matt, is that ok with you?
Yes. There are a handful of cleanups that I should do first though.
Please make one of those a better help.
It should be obvious that ketchup 2.6-mm fetch newest -mm
At least in my current
14 matches
Mail list logo