Re: [BUG] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference...as_move_to_dispatch+0x11/0x135

2007-02-02 Thread Andrew Vasquez
On Fri, 02 Feb 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:25:41 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 12:56:30 -0800 > > Andrew Vasquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > dt of=/dev/raw/raw1 procs=8 oncerr=abort bs=16k disable=stats > > > > > limit=2m passes=1

Re: [BUG] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference...as_move_to_dispatch+0x11/0x135

2007-02-02 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:25:41 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 12:56:30 -0800 > Andrew Vasquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > dt of=/dev/raw/raw1 procs=8 oncerr=abort bs=16k disable=stats > > > > limit=2m passes=100 pattern=iot dlimit=2048 > > What is this mysteri

Re: [BUG] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference...as_move_to_dispatch+0x11/0x135

2007-02-02 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 12:56:30 -0800 Andrew Vasquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > dt of=/dev/raw/raw1 procs=8 oncerr=abort bs=16k disable=stats > > > limit=2m passes=100 pattern=iot dlimit=2048 What is this mysterious dt command, btw? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "u

Re: [BUG] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference...as_move_to_dispatch+0x11/0x135

2007-02-02 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 12:56:30 -0800 Andrew Vasquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 01 Feb 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 10:35:10 -0800 Andrew Vasquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Basically what is happening from the FC side is the initiator executes > > > a simple dt

Re: [BUG] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference...as_move_to_dispatch+0x11/0x135

2007-02-02 Thread Andrew Vasquez
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 10:35:10 -0800 Andrew Vasquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Basically what is happening from the FC side is the initiator executes > > a simple dt test: > > > > dt of=/dev/raw/raw1 procs=8 oncerr=abort bs=16k disable=stats

Re: [BUG] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference...as_move_to_dispatch+0x11/0x135

2007-02-01 Thread Andrew Morton
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 10:35:10 -0800 Andrew Vasquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All, > > We've been trying to track down a nagging regression seen during some > port-disable/enable testing. The problem occurs anywhere from > 20 minutes to 120 minutes of testing under very minimal I/O load: > >

[BUG] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference...as_move_to_dispatch+0x11/0x135

2007-01-22 Thread Andrew Vasquez
All, We've been trying to track down a nagging regression seen during some port-disable/enable testing. The problem occurs anywhere from 20 minutes to 120 minutes of testing under very minimal I/O load: [ 1143.890598] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0028