Re: [BUG] cpufreq: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/workqueue.c:2811

2013-02-08 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, February 08, 2013 11:24:39 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 7 February 2013 06:11, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Subject: cpufreq: Move sysfs_remove_link() from under a spinlock > > > > Commit 73bf0fc "cpufreq: Don't remove sysfs link for policy->cpu" > >

Re: [BUG] cpufreq: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/workqueue.c:2811

2013-02-08 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, February 08, 2013 11:24:39 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: On 7 February 2013 06:11, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote: From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com Subject: cpufreq: Move sysfs_remove_link() from under a spinlock Commit 73bf0fc cpufreq: Don't remove sysfs link

Re: [BUG] cpufreq: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/workqueue.c:2811

2013-02-07 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 7 February 2013 06:11, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > Subject: cpufreq: Move sysfs_remove_link() from under a spinlock > > Commit 73bf0fc "cpufreq: Don't remove sysfs link for policy->cpu" > attempted to fix a bug in __cpufreq_remove_dev() by avoiding to > remove the

Re: [BUG] cpufreq: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/workqueue.c:2811

2013-02-07 Thread Viresh Kumar
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Artem Savkov wrote: > I get the following BUG on suspend using systemd-sleep(this doesn't > happen with pm-suspend). This seems to be introduced by some of the > Viresh's patches. Hi Artem, I have sent another patchset (and you are in --to), please test your

Re: [BUG] cpufreq: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/workqueue.c:2811

2013-02-07 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 7 February 2013 06:11, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote: From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com Subject: cpufreq: Move sysfs_remove_link() from under a spinlock Commit 73bf0fc cpufreq: Don't remove sysfs link for policy-cpu attempted to fix a bug in __cpufreq_remove_dev()

Re: [BUG] cpufreq: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/workqueue.c:2811

2013-02-07 Thread Viresh Kumar
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Artem Savkov artem.sav...@gmail.com wrote: I get the following BUG on suspend using systemd-sleep(this doesn't happen with pm-suspend). This seems to be introduced by some of the Viresh's patches. Hi Artem, I have sent another patchset (and you are in --to),

Re: [BUG] cpufreq: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/workqueue.c:2811

2013-02-06 Thread Artem Savkov
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 01:41:57AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, February 06, 2013 10:11:25 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thursday, February 07, 2013 12:25:13 AM Artem Savkov wrote: > > > I get the following BUG on suspend using systemd-sleep(this doesn't > > > happen with

Re: [BUG] cpufreq: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/workqueue.c:2811

2013-02-06 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, February 06, 2013 10:11:25 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, February 07, 2013 12:25:13 AM Artem Savkov wrote: > > I get the following BUG on suspend using systemd-sleep(this doesn't > > happen with pm-suspend). This seems to be introduced by some of the > > Viresh's

Re: [BUG] cpufreq: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/workqueue.c:2811

2013-02-06 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, February 07, 2013 12:25:13 AM Artem Savkov wrote: > I get the following BUG on suspend using systemd-sleep(this doesn't > happen with pm-suspend). This seems to be introduced by some of the > Viresh's patches. Which branch from which day? Rafael > [ 94.908046] Disabling non-boot

[BUG] cpufreq: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/workqueue.c:2811

2013-02-06 Thread Artem Savkov
I get the following BUG on suspend using systemd-sleep(this doesn't happen with pm-suspend). This seems to be introduced by some of the Viresh's patches. [ 94.908046] Disabling non-boot CPUs ... [ 94.908416] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/workqueue.c:2811 [

[BUG] cpufreq: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/workqueue.c:2811

2013-02-06 Thread Artem Savkov
I get the following BUG on suspend using systemd-sleep(this doesn't happen with pm-suspend). This seems to be introduced by some of the Viresh's patches. [ 94.908046] Disabling non-boot CPUs ... [ 94.908416] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/workqueue.c:2811 [

Re: [BUG] cpufreq: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/workqueue.c:2811

2013-02-06 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, February 07, 2013 12:25:13 AM Artem Savkov wrote: I get the following BUG on suspend using systemd-sleep(this doesn't happen with pm-suspend). This seems to be introduced by some of the Viresh's patches. Which branch from which day? Rafael [ 94.908046] Disabling non-boot

Re: [BUG] cpufreq: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/workqueue.c:2811

2013-02-06 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Wednesday, February 06, 2013 10:11:25 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Thursday, February 07, 2013 12:25:13 AM Artem Savkov wrote: I get the following BUG on suspend using systemd-sleep(this doesn't happen with pm-suspend). This seems to be introduced by some of the Viresh's patches.

Re: [BUG] cpufreq: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/workqueue.c:2811

2013-02-06 Thread Artem Savkov
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 01:41:57AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Wednesday, February 06, 2013 10:11:25 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Thursday, February 07, 2013 12:25:13 AM Artem Savkov wrote: I get the following BUG on suspend using systemd-sleep(this doesn't happen with