Re: [BUG] e100: eth0 appers many times in /proc/interrupts after resume

2007-01-22 Thread Auke Kok
Frederik Deweerdt wrote: On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 01:45:27PM -0800, Auke Kok wrote: Frederik Deweerdt wrote: On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:17:41PM +0200, Andrei Popa wrote: It's the 10th resume and in /proc/interrupts eth0 appers 10 times. The e100_resume() function should be calling

Re: [BUG] e100: eth0 appers many times in /proc/interrupts after resume

2007-01-22 Thread Auke Kok
Frederik Deweerdt wrote: On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 01:45:27PM -0800, Auke Kok wrote: Frederik Deweerdt wrote: On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:17:41PM +0200, Andrei Popa wrote: It's the 10th resume and in /proc/interrupts eth0 appers 10 times. The e100_resume() function should be calling

Re: [BUG] e100: eth0 appers many times in /proc/interrupts after resume

2007-01-21 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 01:45:27PM -0800, Auke Kok wrote: > Frederik Deweerdt wrote: > >On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:17:41PM +0200, Andrei Popa wrote: > >>It's the 10th resume and in /proc/interrupts eth0 appers 10 times. > >The e100_resume() function should be calling netif_device_detach and >

Re: [BUG] e100: eth0 appers many times in /proc/interrupts after resume

2007-01-21 Thread Auke Kok
Frederik Deweerdt wrote: On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:17:41PM +0200, Andrei Popa wrote: It's the 10th resume and in /proc/interrupts eth0 appers 10 times. The e100_resume() function should be calling netif_device_detach and free_irq. Could you try the following (compile tested) patch? I just

Re: [BUG] e100: eth0 appers many times in /proc/interrupts after resume

2007-01-21 Thread Auke Kok
Frederik Deweerdt wrote: On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:17:41PM +0200, Andrei Popa wrote: It's the 10th resume and in /proc/interrupts eth0 appers 10 times. The e100_resume() function should be calling netif_device_detach and free_irq. Could you try the following (compile tested) patch? I just

Re: [BUG] e100: eth0 appers many times in /proc/interrupts after resume

2007-01-21 Thread Frederik Deweerdt
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 01:45:27PM -0800, Auke Kok wrote: Frederik Deweerdt wrote: On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 09:17:41PM +0200, Andrei Popa wrote: It's the 10th resume and in /proc/interrupts eth0 appers 10 times. The e100_resume() function should be calling netif_device_detach and free_irq.