Hi,
> Hi, again,
>
> I haven't tested any patch or bisected, but I have another data point.
> I built and tested Linux 5.8.18, with the same firmware, and it is
> working correctly. I reduced the test case to just rfkilling the
> connection, which showed the register dump immediately (before that
Hi, again,
I haven't tested any patch or bisected, but I have another data point.
I built and tested Linux 5.8.18, with the same firmware, and it is
working correctly. I reduced the test case to just rfkilling the
connection, which showed the register dump immediately (before that I
was using the
Hi again, Emmanuel,
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 21:07, Emmanuel Grumbach wrote:
>
> Indeed, the bit is reverse logic. So we can put that aside.
> Frankly, I have no clue. You can try our backport tree to bisect,
> should be easier..
> What I see here is that your GP_CTRL value is 080003d8
>
> #define C
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 10:47 PM Emmanuel Grumbach wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 10:40 PM Rui Salvaterra wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Emmanuel,
> >
> > On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 20:32, Emmanuel Grumbach wrote:
> > >
> > > Rui, I looked at the register dump and looks like you're using AMT on
> > > your syst
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 10:40 PM Rui Salvaterra wrote:
>
> Hi, Emmanuel,
>
> On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 20:32, Emmanuel Grumbach wrote:
> >
> > Rui, I looked at the register dump and looks like you're using AMT on
> > your system?
> > Can you confirm?
>
> AMT? You mean Intel Active Management? Heavens,
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 10:32 PM Emmanuel Grumbach wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 7:19 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 23:17:48 + Rui Salvaterra wrote:
> > > Hi, Luca,
> > >
> > > On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 16:27, Coelho, Luciano
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2020-12-08 at 1
Hi, again,
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 20:40, Emmanuel Grumbach wrote:
>
> Besides, don't you get a stack dump in the vicinity of this register
> dump? That's be helpful to see.
Nope. No stack trace at all. Only the register dump.
Thanks,
Rui
Hi, Emmanuel,
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 20:32, Emmanuel Grumbach wrote:
>
> Rui, I looked at the register dump and looks like you're using AMT on
> your system?
> Can you confirm?
AMT? You mean Intel Active Management? Heavens, no, not that I know
of! This is a personal laptop (Lenovo B51-80). (And
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 7:19 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>
> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 23:17:48 + Rui Salvaterra wrote:
> > Hi, Luca,
> >
> > On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 16:27, Coelho, Luciano
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2020-12-08 at 11:27 +, Rui Salvaterra wrote:
> > > >
> > > > [ 3174.003910] iwlwifi 000
Hi, guys,
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 17:13, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>
> Any luck figuring this out, Luca? If this is a 5.10 regression we need
> to let Linus know tomorrow, so the time is ticking :(
I don't have the possibility to test other kernels at the moment, but
I will do so in a few days (at lea
Hi Jakub et al,
On Wed, 2020-12-09 at 09:13 -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 23:17:48 + Rui Salvaterra wrote:
> > Hi, Luca,
> >
> > On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 16:27, Coelho, Luciano
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2020-12-08 at 11:27 +, Rui Salvaterra wrote:
> > > >
> > > > [ 31
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 23:17:48 + Rui Salvaterra wrote:
> Hi, Luca,
>
> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 16:27, Coelho, Luciano wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-12-08 at 11:27 +, Rui Salvaterra wrote:
> > >
> > > [ 3174.003910] iwlwifi :02:00.0: RF_KILL bit toggled to disable radio.
> > > [ 3174.003913] iw
Hi, Luca,
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 16:27, Coelho, Luciano wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2020-12-08 at 11:27 +, Rui Salvaterra wrote:
> >
> > [ 3174.003910] iwlwifi :02:00.0: RF_KILL bit toggled to disable radio.
> > [ 3174.003913] iwlwifi :02:00.0: reporting RF_KILL (radio disabled)
>
> It looks li
Hi, Jakub,
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 16:06, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>
> Just to confirm - is this a regression in 5.10-rc? Does 5.9 work
> smoothly in the problematic scenario?
Good question. It's definitely a regression, though I don't remember
exactly the last working version I had. I *think* 5.9 wa
On Tue, 2020-12-08 at 11:27 +, Rui Salvaterra wrote:
> Hi, everyone,
>
> I'm running Linux 5.10-rc7 with this firmware/hardware:
>
> [1.431878] iwlwifi :02:00.0: loaded firmware version
> 29.198743027.0 7265D-29.ucode op_mode iwlmvm
> [1.431899] iwlwifi :02:00.0: Detected Inte
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 11:27:50 + Rui Salvaterra wrote:
> Hi, everyone,
>
> I'm running Linux 5.10-rc7 with this firmware/hardware:
>
> [1.431878] iwlwifi :02:00.0: loaded firmware version
> 29.198743027.0 7265D-29.ucode op_mode iwlmvm
> [1.431899] iwlwifi :02:00.0: Detected Intel
Hi, everyone,
I'm running Linux 5.10-rc7 with this firmware/hardware:
[1.431878] iwlwifi :02:00.0: loaded firmware version
29.198743027.0 7265D-29.ucode op_mode iwlmvm
[1.431899] iwlwifi :02:00.0: Detected Intel(R) Dual Band
Wireless AC 3165, REV=0x210
Most of the time, after dis
17 matches
Mail list logo
