Em Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 11:28:29AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 07:41:20AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 03:40:32PM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > > $ perf script
> > > Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
> > > event-parse.c:464
>
Em Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 07:41:20AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 03:40:32PM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > $ perf script
> > Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> > $ gdb perf
> > (gdb) r script
> > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> >
Em Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 07:41:20AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 03:40:32PM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
$ perf script
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
$ gdb perf
(gdb) r script
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x0050f98b in
Em Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 11:28:29AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
Em Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 07:41:20AM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 03:40:32PM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
$ perf script
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
event-parse.c:464
Looks like
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 03:40:32PM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Hi Arnaldo, Jiri
>
> Running this simple command from tip.git tree, I get:
>
>
> $ perf record ls
>
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.011 MB perf.data (9 samples) ]
>
> $
Hi Arnaldo, Jiri
Running this simple command from tip.git tree, I get:
$ perf record ls
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.011 MB perf.data (9 samples) ]
$ perf script
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
$ gdb perf
(gdb) r script
Program
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 03:40:32PM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
Hi Arnaldo, Jiri
Running this simple command from tip.git tree, I get:
$ perf record ls
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.011 MB perf.data (9 samples) ]
$ perf script
Hi Arnaldo, Jiri
Running this simple command from tip.git tree, I get:
$ perf record ls
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.011 MB perf.data (9 samples) ]
$ perf script
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
$ gdb perf
(gdb) r script
Program
On 4/7/15 5:41 PM, David Ahern wrote:
what happened to this patch? not in your core or urgent branches and
perf-script is still bombing
d'oh. never mind; user error.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
what happened to this patch? not in your core or urgent branches and
perf-script is still bombing
On 3/31/15 7:36 AM, David Ahern wrote:
On 3/31/15 6:59 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 08:45:33PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
escreveu:
Em Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at
what happened to this patch? not in your core or urgent branches and
perf-script is still bombing
On 3/31/15 7:36 AM, David Ahern wrote:
On 3/31/15 6:59 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 08:45:33PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
escreveu:
Em Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at
On 4/7/15 5:41 PM, David Ahern wrote:
what happened to this patch? not in your core or urgent branches and
perf-script is still bombing
d'oh. never mind; user error.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 01:14:20PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 05:50:48PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 05:48:44PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:57:39AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > >
> > > SNIP
Em Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 01:14:20PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 05:50:48PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 05:48:44PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:57:39AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > >
> > >
Em Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 05:50:48PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 05:48:44PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:57:39AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >
> > SNIP
> >
> > > struct ordered_events *oe = >ordered_events;
> > > - struct perf_tool
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 05:48:44PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:57:39AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> > struct ordered_events *oe = >ordered_events;
> > - struct perf_tool *tool = oe->tool;
> > + struct perf_tool *tool = session->tool;
> >
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:57:39AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
SNIP
> struct ordered_events *oe = >ordered_events;
> - struct perf_tool *tool = oe->tool;
> + struct perf_tool *tool = session->tool;
> int fd = perf_data_file__fd(session->file);
> u64 head,
Em Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:37:44AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 04:25:57PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > I was just replying to the poluted ordered_events .. I haven't tracked
> :-) Yeah, that was kinda a layering violation, its good that we can
> remove
Em Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 04:25:57PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:13:26AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> > And setting tool->ordered_events to false;
> >
> > What fails is perf_evlist__sample_id_all(session->evlist), I went as far as
> > looking at
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:13:26AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
SNIP
> And setting tool->ordered_events to false;
>
> What fails is perf_evlist__sample_id_all(session->evlist), I went as far as
> looking at the perf_evlist__sample_id_all call that will find a first evsel,
> with all
Em Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:02:16AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 03:58:01PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 09:59:20AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 08:45:33PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> > >
Em Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 03:58:01PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 09:59:20AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 08:45:33PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > > Em Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:51:34PM -0600, David Ahern escreveu:
> > > >
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 09:59:20AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 08:45:33PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:51:34PM -0600, David Ahern escreveu:
> > > tool was moved to ordered_events and is not initialized for pipe mode.
On 3/31/15 6:59 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 08:45:33PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
Em Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:51:34PM -0600, David Ahern escreveu:
tool was moved to ordered_events and is not initialized for pipe mode. I
don't have time to look into
Em Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 08:45:33PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:51:34PM -0600, David Ahern escreveu:
> > tool was moved to ordered_events and is not initialized for pipe mode. I
> > don't have time to look into it more than that before PTO on Wednesday.
Em Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 08:45:33PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
Em Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:51:34PM -0600, David Ahern escreveu:
tool was moved to ordered_events and is not initialized for pipe mode. I
don't have time to look into it more than that before PTO on Wednesday.
I
Em Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 03:58:01PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 09:59:20AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 08:45:33PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
Em Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:51:34PM -0600, David Ahern escreveu:
tool was
Em Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:02:16AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
Em Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 03:58:01PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 09:59:20AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 08:45:33PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:13:26AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
SNIP
And setting tool-ordered_events to false;
What fails is perf_evlist__sample_id_all(session-evlist), I went as far as
looking at the perf_evlist__sample_id_all call that will find a first evsel,
with all its
Em Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 04:25:57PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:13:26AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
SNIP
And setting tool-ordered_events to false;
What fails is perf_evlist__sample_id_all(session-evlist), I went as far as
looking at the
Em Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:37:44AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
Em Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 04:25:57PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
I was just replying to the poluted ordered_events .. I haven't tracked
:-) Yeah, that was kinda a layering violation, its good that we can
remove it
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:57:39AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
SNIP
struct ordered_events *oe = session-ordered_events;
- struct perf_tool *tool = oe-tool;
+ struct perf_tool *tool = session-tool;
int fd = perf_data_file__fd(session-file);
u64 head,
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 01:14:20PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 05:50:48PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 05:48:44PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:57:39AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
SNIP
Em Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 01:14:20PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
Em Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 05:50:48PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 05:48:44PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:57:39AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
SNIP
Em Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 05:50:48PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 05:48:44PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:57:39AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
SNIP
struct ordered_events *oe = session-ordered_events;
- struct perf_tool *tool =
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 05:48:44PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:57:39AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
SNIP
struct ordered_events *oe = session-ordered_events;
- struct perf_tool *tool = oe-tool;
+ struct perf_tool *tool = session-tool;
int
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 09:59:20AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 08:45:33PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
Em Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:51:34PM -0600, David Ahern escreveu:
tool was moved to ordered_events and is not initialized for pipe mode. I
On 3/31/15 6:59 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 08:45:33PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
Em Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:51:34PM -0600, David Ahern escreveu:
tool was moved to ordered_events and is not initialized for pipe mode. I
don't have time to look into
Em Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:51:34PM -0600, David Ahern escreveu:
> Surprised Stephane has not hit this one yet:
>
> $ perf record -e -a | perf script
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
> It's the second one that core dumps.
>
> $ gdb perf core.16704
> ...
> [New LWP 16704]
> [Thread debugging
Surprised Stephane has not hit this one yet:
$ perf record -e -a | perf script
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
It's the second one that core dumps.
$ gdb perf core.16704
...
[New LWP 16704]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library
Em Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:51:34PM -0600, David Ahern escreveu:
Surprised Stephane has not hit this one yet:
$ perf record -e any-event -a | perf script
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
It's the second one that core dumps.
$ gdb perf core.16704
...
[New LWP 16704]
[Thread debugging
Surprised Stephane has not hit this one yet:
$ perf record -e any-event -a | perf script
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
It's the second one that core dumps.
$ gdb perf core.16704
...
[New LWP 16704]
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library
42 matches
Mail list logo
