On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 10:10:58AM -0700, Andy Isaacson wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 08:27:46PM +0800, WU Fengguang wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 05:27:52PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > > For some reason my mailer keeps removing you from the cc.
> >
> > Or maybe it's my SMTP server's
On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 10:10:58AM -0700, Andy Isaacson wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 08:27:46PM +0800, WU Fengguang wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 05:27:52PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
For some reason my mailer keeps removing you from the cc.
Or maybe it's my SMTP server's problem.
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 08:27:46PM +0800, WU Fengguang wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 05:27:52PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > For some reason my mailer keeps removing you from the cc.
>
> Or maybe it's my SMTP server's problem. Email systems are complex.
It's the Mail-Followup-To header you
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 08:27:46PM +0800, WU Fengguang wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 05:27:52PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
For some reason my mailer keeps removing you from the cc.
Or maybe it's my SMTP server's problem. Email systems are complex.
It's the Mail-Followup-To header you
[Alan Cox - Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 12:22:24PM +0100]
| > Well, as I see, it seems the Alan's patch is correct. We pass
| > newly created mm to security_vm_enough_memory_mm() and get no errors
| > here even for overcommit = 2. But my question was that mm->total_vm
| > = 0 for this case and that is
> Well, as I see, it seems the Alan's patch is correct. We pass
> newly created mm to security_vm_enough_memory_mm() and get no errors
> here even for overcommit = 2. But my question was that mm->total_vm
> = 0 for this case and that is probably valid too I think. What about
> the thing you
[WU Fengguang - Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 08:23:42AM +0800]
| On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 08:21:43PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
| > [Alan Cox - Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 04:17:44PM +0100]
| > | Try this (it compiles but isnt tested). Its a weekend here, the sun is
| > | shining, the beach is a short walk,
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 04:17:44PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Try this (it compiles but isnt tested). Its a weekend here, the sun is
> shining, the beach is a short walk, and I have more interesting things to
> do right now 8)
Have a nice day~~~ It works!
> ---
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 04:17:44PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
Try this (it compiles but isnt tested). Its a weekend here, the sun is
shining, the beach is a short walk, and I have more interesting things to
do right now 8)
Have a nice day~~~ It works!
--- linux.vanilla-2.6.23rc1-mm1/mm/mmap.c
[WU Fengguang - Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 08:23:42AM +0800]
| On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 08:21:43PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
| [Alan Cox - Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 04:17:44PM +0100]
| | Try this (it compiles but isnt tested). Its a weekend here, the sun is
| | shining, the beach is a short walk, and I
Well, as I see, it seems the Alan's patch is correct. We pass
newly created mm to security_vm_enough_memory_mm() and get no errors
here even for overcommit = 2. But my question was that mm-total_vm
= 0 for this case and that is probably valid too I think. What about
the thing you pointed
[Alan Cox - Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 12:22:24PM +0100]
| Well, as I see, it seems the Alan's patch is correct. We pass
| newly created mm to security_vm_enough_memory_mm() and get no errors
| here even for overcommit = 2. But my question was that mm-total_vm
| = 0 for this case and that is
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 08:21:43PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> [Alan Cox - Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 04:17:44PM +0100]
> | Try this (it compiles but isnt tested). Its a weekend here, the sun is
> | shining, the beach is a short walk, and I have more interesting things to
> | do right now 8)
> |
>
On 08/12/2007 05:17 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
Try this (it compiles but isnt tested). Its a weekend here, the sun is
shining, the beach is a short walk, and I have more interesting things to
do right now 8)
Oh come on, you have a beard. You can't go to the beach.
Rene.
-
To unsubscribe from this
[Alan Cox - Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 04:17:44PM +0100]
| Try this (it compiles but isnt tested). Its a weekend here, the sun is
| shining, the beach is a short walk, and I have more interesting things to
| do right now 8)
|
|
| diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude
Try this (it compiles but isnt tested). Its a weekend here, the sun is
shining, the beach is a short walk, and I have more interesting things to
do right now 8)
diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude
linux.vanilla-2.6.23rc1-mm1/include/linux/mm.h
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 02:19:05PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > Great! So the problem might have existed for some time, but we never
> > > saw it due to default over commit values? Were you using these values
> > > for over commit even before?
> >
> > No I changed it several weeks ago to stop my
> > Great! So the problem might have existed for some time, but we never
> > saw it due to default over commit values? Were you using these values
> > for over commit even before?
>
> No I changed it several weeks ago to stop my desktop from freezing.
> So yes, the bug may have been there for a
Hi Balbir,
[add CC to LKML]
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 05:27:52PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> For some reason my mailer keeps removing you from the cc.
Or maybe it's my SMTP server's problem. Email systems are complex.
> >>> Thats a valid point. It would be interesting to see what the overcommit
[Balbir Singh - Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 02:55:32PM +0530]
| WU Fengguang wrote:
| > On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 01:48:31PM +0800, WU Fengguang wrote:
| >> On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 11:31:09PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
| >>> Andrew Morton wrote:
| On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:00:12 +0530 "Balbir Singh"
WU Fengguang wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 01:48:31PM +0800, WU Fengguang wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 11:31:09PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
>>> Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:00:12 +0530 "Balbir Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Shouldn't we just not stop vm
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 01:48:31PM +0800, WU Fengguang wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 11:31:09PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:00:12 +0530 "Balbir Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >> Shouldn't we just not stop vm accounting
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 01:48:31PM +0800, WU Fengguang wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 11:31:09PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:00:12 +0530 Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Shouldn't we just not stop vm accounting for kernel threads?
WU Fengguang wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 01:48:31PM +0800, WU Fengguang wrote:
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 11:31:09PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:00:12 +0530 Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Shouldn't we just not stop vm accounting for kernel
[Balbir Singh - Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 02:55:32PM +0530]
| WU Fengguang wrote:
| On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 01:48:31PM +0800, WU Fengguang wrote:
| On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 11:31:09PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
| Andrew Morton wrote:
| On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:00:12 +0530 Balbir Singh [EMAIL
Hi Balbir,
[add CC to LKML]
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 05:27:52PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
For some reason my mailer keeps removing you from the cc.
Or maybe it's my SMTP server's problem. Email systems are complex.
Thats a valid point. It would be interesting to see what the overcommit
Great! So the problem might have existed for some time, but we never
saw it due to default over commit values? Were you using these values
for over commit even before?
No I changed it several weeks ago to stop my desktop from freezing.
So yes, the bug may have been there for a while.
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 02:19:05PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
Great! So the problem might have existed for some time, but we never
saw it due to default over commit values? Were you using these values
for over commit even before?
No I changed it several weeks ago to stop my desktop from
Try this (it compiles but isnt tested). Its a weekend here, the sun is
shining, the beach is a short walk, and I have more interesting things to
do right now 8)
diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude
linux.vanilla-2.6.23rc1-mm1/include/linux/mm.h
[Alan Cox - Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 04:17:44PM +0100]
| Try this (it compiles but isnt tested). Its a weekend here, the sun is
| shining, the beach is a short walk, and I have more interesting things to
| do right now 8)
|
|
| diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude
On 08/12/2007 05:17 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
Try this (it compiles but isnt tested). Its a weekend here, the sun is
shining, the beach is a short walk, and I have more interesting things to
do right now 8)
Oh come on, you have a beard. You can't go to the beach.
Rene.
-
To unsubscribe from this
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 08:21:43PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
[Alan Cox - Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 04:17:44PM +0100]
| Try this (it compiles but isnt tested). Its a weekend here, the sun is
| shining, the beach is a short walk, and I have more interesting things to
| do right now 8)
|
|
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 11:31:09PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:00:12 +0530 "Balbir Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>
> >> Shouldn't we just not stop vm accounting for kernel threads?
> >>
> >
> > Could be. It'd help heaps if we knew which
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 10:00:15AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:00:12 +0530 "Balbir Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 8/11/07, Fengguang Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hm, both people who replied to this removed Fengguang from cc. Disagreement
> between
[Fengguang Wu - Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 01:29:15PM +0800]
| On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 06:17:14PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
| > [Fengguang Wu - Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 09:21:31PM +0800]
| > | Andrew,
| > |
| > | I'm not sure if this patch is the right fix for the bug. But it do
| > | stops the oops
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 06:17:14PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> [Fengguang Wu - Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 09:21:31PM +0800]
> | Andrew,
> |
> | I'm not sure if this patch is the right fix for the bug. But it do
> | stops the oops message. The bug also happens in
> 2.6.23-rc1-mm2/2.6.23-rc2-mm2.
>
[Balbir Singh - Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 11:31:09PM +0530]
| Andrew Morton wrote:
| > On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:00:12 +0530 "Balbir Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| >
| >> On 8/11/07, Fengguang Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| >
| > hm, both people who replied to this removed Fengguang from cc.
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:00:12 +0530 "Balbir Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 8/11/07, Fengguang Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hm, both people who replied to this removed Fengguang from cc. Disagreement
> between headers and MUAs, perhaps?
>
Oops... Not sure
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:00:12 +0530 "Balbir Singh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/11/07, Fengguang Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hm, both people who replied to this removed Fengguang from cc. Disagreement
between headers and MUAs, perhaps?
> > Andrew,
> >
> > I'm not sure if this patch is
On 8/11/07, Fengguang Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> I'm not sure if this patch is the right fix for the bug. But it do
> stops the oops message. The bug also happens in 2.6.23-rc1-mm2/2.6.23-rc2-mm2.
> I'm running debian/sid. The .config is attached.
>
>
> Unable to handle kernel
[Fengguang Wu - Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 09:21:31PM +0800]
| Andrew,
|
| I'm not sure if this patch is the right fix for the bug. But it do
| stops the oops message. The bug also happens in 2.6.23-rc1-mm2/2.6.23-rc2-mm2.
| I'm running debian/sid. The .config is attached.
|
|
[...snip...]
Even if
Andrew,
I'm not sure if this patch is the right fix for the bug. But it do
stops the oops message. The bug also happens in 2.6.23-rc1-mm2/2.6.23-rc2-mm2.
I'm running debian/sid. The .config is attached.
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0138 RIP
[]
Andrew,
I'm not sure if this patch is the right fix for the bug. But it do
stops the oops message. The bug also happens in 2.6.23-rc1-mm2/2.6.23-rc2-mm2.
I'm running debian/sid. The .config is attached.
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0138 RIP
[Fengguang Wu - Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 09:21:31PM +0800]
| Andrew,
|
| I'm not sure if this patch is the right fix for the bug. But it do
| stops the oops message. The bug also happens in 2.6.23-rc1-mm2/2.6.23-rc2-mm2.
| I'm running debian/sid. The .config is attached.
|
|
[...snip...]
Even if
On 8/11/07, Fengguang Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew,
I'm not sure if this patch is the right fix for the bug. But it do
stops the oops message. The bug also happens in 2.6.23-rc1-mm2/2.6.23-rc2-mm2.
I'm running debian/sid. The .config is attached.
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:00:12 +0530 Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/11/07, Fengguang Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hm, both people who replied to this removed Fengguang from cc. Disagreement
between headers and MUAs, perhaps?
Andrew,
I'm not sure if this patch is the right fix
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:00:12 +0530 Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/11/07, Fengguang Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hm, both people who replied to this removed Fengguang from cc. Disagreement
between headers and MUAs, perhaps?
Oops... Not sure how that
[Balbir Singh - Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 11:31:09PM +0530]
| Andrew Morton wrote:
| On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:00:12 +0530 Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| On 8/11/07, Fengguang Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| hm, both people who replied to this removed Fengguang from cc. Disagreement
|
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 06:17:14PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
[Fengguang Wu - Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 09:21:31PM +0800]
| Andrew,
|
| I'm not sure if this patch is the right fix for the bug. But it do
| stops the oops message. The bug also happens in
2.6.23-rc1-mm2/2.6.23-rc2-mm2.
| I'm
[Fengguang Wu - Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 01:29:15PM +0800]
| On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 06:17:14PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
| [Fengguang Wu - Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 09:21:31PM +0800]
| | Andrew,
| |
| | I'm not sure if this patch is the right fix for the bug. But it do
| | stops the oops
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 10:00:15AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:00:12 +0530 Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/11/07, Fengguang Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hm, both people who replied to this removed Fengguang from cc. Disagreement
between headers and MUAs,
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 11:31:09PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:00:12 +0530 Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shouldn't we just not stop vm accounting for kernel threads?
Could be. It'd help heaps if we knew which patch in -mm caused
52 matches
Mail list logo
