On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 14:20:48 -0500
Paul Fulghum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 10:16 -0500, Paul Fulghum wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 05:06 +0200, Bj__rn Steinbrink wrote:
> > > This is do_tty_hangup() exchanging the fops while we're waiting for the
> > > lock. The new fops
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 10:16 -0500, Paul Fulghum wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 05:06 +0200, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> > This is do_tty_hangup() exchanging the fops while we're waiting for the
> > lock. The new fops (hung_up_tty_fops) only have the unlocked variant and
> > thus we Oops our way.
...
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 05:06 +0200, Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> This is do_tty_hangup() exchanging the fops while we're waiting for the
> lock. The new fops (hung_up_tty_fops) only have the unlocked variant and
> thus we Oops our way.
>
> The following program reproduces it quite easily on a SMP box.
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 20:16 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 05:06:29 +0200 Björn Steinbrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is do_tty_hangup() exchanging the fops while we're waiting for the
> > lock. The new fops (hung_up_tty_fops) only have the unlocked variant and
> > thus w
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 05:06:29 +0200 Björn Steinbrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007.05.26 21:10:15 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > Le jeudi 17 mai 2007 à 18:59 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
> > > Le jeudi 17 mai 2007 à 09:45 -0700, Randy Dunlap a écrit :
> > >
> > > > Can you boot with "
On 2007.05.26 21:10:15 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le jeudi 17 mai 2007 à 18:59 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
> > Le jeudi 17 mai 2007 à 09:45 -0700, Randy Dunlap a écrit :
> >
> > > Can you boot with "kstack=32" so that we can see more of the stack?
> >
> > I can try. It's not triggering
Le jeudi 17 mai 2007 à 18:59 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
> Le jeudi 17 mai 2007 à 09:45 -0700, Randy Dunlap a écrit :
>
> > Can you boot with "kstack=32" so that we can see more of the stack?
>
> I can try. It's not triggering quickly though
Seems I was completely wrong about the trigger, b
Le jeudi 17 mai 2007 à 09:45 -0700, Randy Dunlap a écrit :
> On Thu, 17 May 2007 12:00:02 +0200 Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
> > Le lundi 14 mai 2007 à 01:25 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
> >
> > > It happened once so far. The load was moderate (and certainly not
> > > comparable to what I did for
On Thu, 17 May 2007 12:00:02 +0200 Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le lundi 14 mai 2007 à 01:25 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
>
> > It happened once so far. The load was moderate (and certainly not
> > comparable to what I did for Mel yesterday)
>
> Make that twice. The interesting thing is it was p
Le lundi 14 mai 2007 à 01:25 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
> It happened once so far. The load was moderate (and certainly not
> comparable to what I did for Mel yesterday)
Make that twice. The interesting thing is it was preceded by CD/DVD
access just before, to something is rotten there.
10
Le dimanche 13 mai 2007 à 15:47 -0700, Andrew Morton a écrit :
> On Sun, 13 May 2007 14:02:50 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8473
>
> Please follow up via emailed reply-to-all.
>
> In fact, please report -mm bugs via email. bugzilla is more suite
On Sun, 13 May 2007 14:02:50 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8473
Please follow up via emailed reply-to-all.
In fact, please report -mm bugs via email. bugzilla is more suited to
longer-term problems, and -mm bugs are super-short-term, we hope.
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
