> So anyway, what's actually failing is one of these:
Thanks for the analysis.
In theory we could not fail DAC if the machine has <4GB RAM to work around
such buggy drivers, but then they would fail anyways with >4GB. Also
the failure was intended to allow some drivers to use more efficient non
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 08:42:59AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:17:48 -0700 (PDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8942
>
> Seems that DAC960 broke in 2.6.22 - three people are reporting this.
Interesting. Because nobody touched D
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:17:48 -0700 (PDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8942
Seems that DAC960 broke in 2.6.22 - three people are reporting this.
Running `diff -u dmesg-2.6.21 dmesg-2.6.22.3-rc1-slh-smp-2' gives:
--- dmesg-2.6.212007-08-31 08:36:32
3 matches
Mail list logo