Re: [Cluster-devel] Re: [gfs2][RFC] readdir caused ls process into D (uninterruptible) state, under testing with Samba 3.0.25

2007-08-20 Thread Steven Whitehouse
Hi, On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 17:36 +0800, rae l wrote: > On 8/17/07, Steven Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... > > > the stack trace of the 'D' state `ls`: > > > > > > === > > > lsD F89B83F8 2200 12018 1 (NOTLB) > > >f3eeadd4 0082 f6a425c0 f

Re: [Cluster-devel] Re: [gfs2][RFC] readdir caused ls process into D (uninterruptible) state, under testing with Samba 3.0.25

2007-08-20 Thread rae l
On 8/17/07, Steven Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > > the stack trace of the 'D' state `ls`: > > > > === > > lsD F89B83F8 2200 12018 1 (NOTLB) > >f3eeadd4 0082 f6a425c0 f89b83f8 f3eead9c f6a425d4 f6f32d80 > > f573a93c > >0001000

Re: [Cluster-devel] Re: [gfs2][RFC] readdir caused ls process into D (uninterruptible) state, under testing with Samba 3.0.25

2007-08-17 Thread Steven Whitehouse
Hi, On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 15:43 +0800, rae l wrote: [some comments trimmed for brevity] > > > then I start a simple ls command on the gfs2 mouting point: > > > $ ls /mnt/gfs2 > > > the ls process is also changed to D state, > > > > > > I think it's problems about readdir implementation in gfs2, an

Re: [Cluster-devel] Re: [gfs2][RFC] readdir caused ls process into D (uninterruptible) state, under testing with Samba 3.0.25

2007-08-17 Thread rae l
On 8/16/07, Steven Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 16:20 +0800, 程任全 wrote: > > It seems that gfs2 cannot work well with Samba, > > > > I'm using the gfs2 and the new cluster suite(cman with openais), > > > > 1. the testing environment is that 1 iscsi target and