On Thu, 24 Sep 2020, Sumera Priyadarsini wrote:
> While iterating over child nodes with the for_each functions, if
> control is transferred from the middle of the loop, as in the case
> of a break or return or goto, there is no decrement in the
> reference counter thus ultimately resulting in a
On Thu, 24 Sep 2020, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > +@ruletwo depends on patch && !context && !org && !report@
>
> How do you think about to combine code from two SmPL rules
> by using another SmPL disjunction like the following?
What is the goal of doing this?
It seems substantially harder to und
2 matches
Mail list logo
