On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 11:38:10AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> By definition any container (about to be renamed control group)
> subsystem is some kind of "controller" so that bit seems a bit
> redundant.
>
> Any reason not to just call it "cpu" or "cpu_sched"
Done (in the latest patch I sent a w
On 9/10/07, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Unless folks have strong objection to it, I prefer "cptctlr", the way it is.
>
By definition any container (about to be renamed control group)
subsystem is some kind of "controller" so that bit seems a bit
redundant.
Any reason not to
2 matches
Mail list logo
