Re: [E1000-devel] e1000 1sec latency problem

2008-02-07 Thread Kok, Auke
Pavel Machek wrote: > On Thu 2008-02-07 14:32:16, Kok, Auke wrote: >> Pavel Machek wrote: >>> Hi! >>> > I have the famous e1000 latency problems: > > 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=68 ttl=56 time=351.9 ms > 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=69 ttl=56 time=209.2 ms

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000 1sec latency problem

2008-02-07 Thread Pavel Machek
On Thu 2008-02-07 14:32:16, Kok, Auke wrote: > Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > >>> I have the famous e1000 latency problems: > >>> > >>> 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=68 ttl=56 time=351.9 ms > >>> 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=69 ttl=56 time=209.2 ms > >>> 64 bytes from

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000 1sec latency problem

2008-02-07 Thread Kok, Auke
Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > >>> I have the famous e1000 latency problems: >>> >>> 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=68 ttl=56 time=351.9 ms >>> 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=69 ttl=56 time=209.2 ms >>> 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=70 ttl=56 time=1004.1 ms >>> 64 bytes from

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000 1sec latency problem

2008-02-07 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > I have the famous e1000 latency problems: > > > > 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=68 ttl=56 time=351.9 ms > > 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=69 ttl=56 time=209.2 ms > > 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=70 ttl=56 time=1004.1 ms > > 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123:

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000 1sec latency problem

2008-02-07 Thread Max Krasnyansky
Kok, Auke wrote: > Max Krasnyansky wrote: >> Kok, Auke wrote: >>> Max Krasnyansky wrote: Kok, Auke wrote: > Max Krasnyansky wrote: >> So you don't think it's related to the interrupt coalescing by any >> chance ? >> I'd suggest to try and disable the coalescing and see if it

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000 1sec latency problem

2008-02-07 Thread Kok, Auke
Max Krasnyansky wrote: > > Kok, Auke wrote: >> Max Krasnyansky wrote: >>> Kok, Auke wrote: Max Krasnyansky wrote: > So you don't think it's related to the interrupt coalescing by any chance > ? > I'd suggest to try and disable the coalescing and see if it makes any >

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000 1sec latency problem

2008-02-07 Thread Max Krasnyansky
Kok, Auke wrote: > Max Krasnyansky wrote: >> Kok, Auke wrote: >>> Max Krasnyansky wrote: So you don't think it's related to the interrupt coalescing by any chance ? I'd suggest to try and disable the coalescing and see if it makes any difference. We've had lots of issues

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000 1sec latency problem

2008-02-07 Thread Kok, Auke
Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > I have the famous e1000 latency problems: > > 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=68 ttl=56 time=351.9 ms > 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=69 ttl=56 time=209.2 ms > 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=70 ttl=56 time=1004.1 ms > 64 bytes from

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000 1sec latency problem

2008-02-07 Thread Kok, Auke
Max Krasnyansky wrote: > Kok, Auke wrote: >> Max Krasnyansky wrote: >>> So you don't think it's related to the interrupt coalescing by any chance ? >>> I'd suggest to try and disable the coalescing and see if it makes any >>> difference. >>> We've had lots of issues with coalescing misbehavior.

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000 1sec latency problem

2008-02-07 Thread Max Krasnyansky
Kok, Auke wrote: > Max Krasnyansky wrote: >> So you don't think it's related to the interrupt coalescing by any chance ? >> I'd suggest to try and disable the coalescing and see if it makes any >> difference. >> We've had lots of issues with coalescing misbehavior. Not this bad (ie 1 >> second)

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000 1sec latency problem

2008-02-07 Thread Kok, Auke
Max Krasnyansky wrote: > Pavel Machek wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I have the famous e1000 latency problems: >> >> 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=68 ttl=56 time=351.9 ms >> 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=69 ttl=56 time=209.2 ms >> 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=70 ttl=56 time=1004.1

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000 1sec latency problem

2008-02-07 Thread Max Krasnyansky
Kok, Auke wrote: Max Krasnyansky wrote: Kok, Auke wrote: Max Krasnyansky wrote: Kok, Auke wrote: Max Krasnyansky wrote: So you don't think it's related to the interrupt coalescing by any chance ? I'd suggest to try and disable the coalescing and see if it makes any difference. We've

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000 1sec latency problem

2008-02-07 Thread Kok, Auke
Pavel Machek wrote: Hi! I have the famous e1000 latency problems: 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=68 ttl=56 time=351.9 ms 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=69 ttl=56 time=209.2 ms 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=70 ttl=56 time=1004.1 ms 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123:

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000 1sec latency problem

2008-02-07 Thread Max Krasnyansky
Kok, Auke wrote: Max Krasnyansky wrote: Kok, Auke wrote: Max Krasnyansky wrote: So you don't think it's related to the interrupt coalescing by any chance ? I'd suggest to try and disable the coalescing and see if it makes any difference. We've had lots of issues with coalescing

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000 1sec latency problem

2008-02-07 Thread Kok, Auke
Max Krasnyansky wrote: Kok, Auke wrote: Max Krasnyansky wrote: Kok, Auke wrote: Max Krasnyansky wrote: So you don't think it's related to the interrupt coalescing by any chance ? I'd suggest to try and disable the coalescing and see if it makes any difference. We've had lots of issues

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000 1sec latency problem

2008-02-07 Thread Kok, Auke
Max Krasnyansky wrote: Kok, Auke wrote: Max Krasnyansky wrote: So you don't think it's related to the interrupt coalescing by any chance ? I'd suggest to try and disable the coalescing and see if it makes any difference. We've had lots of issues with coalescing misbehavior. Not this bad (ie

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000 1sec latency problem

2008-02-07 Thread Pavel Machek
On Thu 2008-02-07 14:32:16, Kok, Auke wrote: Pavel Machek wrote: Hi! I have the famous e1000 latency problems: 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=68 ttl=56 time=351.9 ms 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=69 ttl=56 time=209.2 ms 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=70

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000 1sec latency problem

2008-02-07 Thread Kok, Auke
Pavel Machek wrote: Hi! I have the famous e1000 latency problems: 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=68 ttl=56 time=351.9 ms 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=69 ttl=56 time=209.2 ms 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=70 ttl=56 time=1004.1 ms 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123:

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000 1sec latency problem

2008-02-07 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! I have the famous e1000 latency problems: 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=68 ttl=56 time=351.9 ms 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=69 ttl=56 time=209.2 ms 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=70 ttl=56 time=1004.1 ms 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=71 ttl=56

Re: [E1000-devel] e1000 1sec latency problem

2008-02-07 Thread Kok, Auke
Pavel Machek wrote: On Thu 2008-02-07 14:32:16, Kok, Auke wrote: Pavel Machek wrote: Hi! I have the famous e1000 latency problems: 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=68 ttl=56 time=351.9 ms 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=69 ttl=56 time=209.2 ms 64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: