Right, I've now disabled every grsecurity kernel config option, apart
from the overarching "Getrewted Kernel Security" one - indicating the
problem is in one of the non #ifdef parts of the patch. Could this be a
problem:
diff -ruN linux/fs/namei.c linux/fs/namei.c
--- linux/fs/namei.cSat
Right, I've now disabled every grsecurity kernel config option, apart
from the overarching Getrewted Kernel Security one - indicating the
problem is in one of the non #ifdef parts of the patch. Could this be a
problem:
diff -ruN linux/fs/namei.c linux/fs/namei.c
--- linux/fs/namei.cSat May
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 12:25:32AM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > This is only true without the COMPAT_DIR_INDEX flag. Since e2fsck _needs_
> > to know about every filesystem feature, it will (correctly) refuse to touch
> > such a system for now. You could "tune2fs -O ^FEATURE_C4 /dev/hdX"
I use debugfs to remove the flag before fsck'ing:
Start debugfs.
Type
open -f -w /dev/
features -FEATURE_C5
-tony
On 26 Jun 2001 00:25:32 +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Monday 25 June 2001 21:51, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > Daniel writes:
> > > Sure, if your root partition is expendable,
I use debugfs to remove the flag before fsck'ing:
Start debugfs.
Type
open -f -w /dev/part
features -FEATURE_C5
-tony
On 26 Jun 2001 00:25:32 +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
On Monday 25 June 2001 21:51, Andreas Dilger wrote:
Daniel writes:
Sure, if your root partition is expendable,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 12:25:32AM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
This is only true without the COMPAT_DIR_INDEX flag. Since e2fsck _needs_
to know about every filesystem feature, it will (correctly) refuse to touch
such a system for now. You could tune2fs -O ^FEATURE_C4 /dev/hdX to
turn
On Monday 25 June 2001 21:51, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> Daniel writes:
> > > > On Wednesday 20 June 2001 16:59, Tony Gale wrote:
> > > > > The main problem I have with this is that e2fsck doesn't know how
> > > > > to deal with it - at least I haven't found a version that will.
> > > > > This makes
Daniel writes:
> > > On Wednesday 20 June 2001 16:59, Tony Gale wrote:
> > > > The main problem I have with this is that e2fsck doesn't know how to
> > > > deal with it - at least I haven't found a version that will. This makes
> > > > it rather difficult to use, especially for your root fs.
>
>
Daniel writes:
On Wednesday 20 June 2001 16:59, Tony Gale wrote:
The main problem I have with this is that e2fsck doesn't know how to
deal with it - at least I haven't found a version that will. This makes
it rather difficult to use, especially for your root fs.
Sure, if your
On Monday 25 June 2001 21:51, Andreas Dilger wrote:
Daniel writes:
On Wednesday 20 June 2001 16:59, Tony Gale wrote:
The main problem I have with this is that e2fsck doesn't know how
to deal with it - at least I haven't found a version that will.
This makes it rather difficult
On Wednesday 20 June 2001 18:02, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 03:59:58PM +0100, Tony Gale wrote:
> > The main problem I have with this is that e2fsck doesn't know how to
> > deal with it - at least I haven't found a version that will. This makes
> > it rather difficult to use,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 03:59:58PM +0100, Tony Gale wrote:
>
> The main problem I have with this is that e2fsck doesn't know how to
> deal with it - at least I haven't found a version that will. This makes
> it rather difficult to use, especially for your root fs.
Getting e2fsck to deal with
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 03:59:58PM +0100, Tony Gale wrote:
The main problem I have with this is that e2fsck doesn't know how to
deal with it - at least I haven't found a version that will. This makes
it rather difficult to use, especially for your root fs.
Getting e2fsck to deal with
On Wednesday 20 June 2001 18:02, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 03:59:58PM +0100, Tony Gale wrote:
The main problem I have with this is that e2fsck doesn't know how to
deal with it - at least I haven't found a version that will. This makes
it rather difficult to use,
14 matches
Mail list logo
