Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> The hard one there is support of arbitrary OS's.
Bah, couldn't care less :-) If all else fails, you can fall back
to the "old-style" boot loader, and let this one boot the legacy
OS. (Well, for GRUB, you'd need the fallback extension, if this
isn't a standard feature yet
Werner Almesberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So if there was a vote to be cast for getting kexec into mainline
> as quickly as possible, you'd certainly have mine :-)
The hard one there is support of arbitrary OS's. Most
of the existing interfaces that have been designed require callbacks
du
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> To some extent. It is worth noting that the first 13 of my patches
> are not core functionality they are bug fixes or feature enhancements
> of code that simply have come to be associated with the work on kexec.
Good point. I didn't even think of the low-level parts of
Werner Almesberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [ Re-sent - seems that one of my MTAs got confused and garbled most
> of the addresses. ]
>
> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > - This code needs to sit in a development tree for a little while
> > to shake out whatever bugs still linger from my ma
4 matches
Mail list logo
