On 5/23/07, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
>> Google does not distribute their software, so they do not have to make
>> their modifications public.
>
> They do for the kernel - they produce an "appliance".
Ah, I stand corrected.
>> WRT the Linux kernel, Google is
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> Alan Cox wrote:
[...]
> >They've quietly fed little bits back now and then but not made a big song
> >and dance about it. Hopefully with Andrew there and the like more will
> >occur.
>
> Strange that the NIC and SATA driver bits never seem to be among those
>
Alan Cox wrote:
Google does not distribute their software, so they do not have to make
their modifications public.
They do for the kernel - they produce an "appliance".
Ah, I stand corrected.
WRT the Linux kernel, Google is essentially a closed source company.
They've quietly fed little
> Google does not distribute their software, so they do not have to make
> their modifications public.
They do for the kernel - they produce an "appliance".
> WRT the Linux kernel, Google is essentially a closed source company.
They've quietly fed little bits back now and then but not made a
Chris Malton wrote:
And where, may I ask, does one find the source of Google's modified
kernel? (At least, the unmodified bits!)
Google does not distribute their software, so they do not have to make
their modifications public.
WRT the Linux kernel, Google is essentially a closed source
And copy to the list...
--- Begin Message ---
And where, may I ask, does one find the source of Google's modified
kernel? (At least, the unmodified bits!)
Chris
Matti Aarnio wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 04:50:35PM +0200, Diego Calleja wrote:
El Wed, 23 May 2007 16:23:44 +0200, Gergo
And copy to the list...
---BeginMessage---
And where, may I ask, does one find the source of Google's modified
kernel? (At least, the unmodified bits!)
Chris
Matti Aarnio wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 04:50:35PM +0200, Diego Calleja wrote:
El Wed, 23 May 2007 16:23:44 +0200, Gergo
Chris Malton wrote:
And where, may I ask, does one find the source of Google's modified
kernel? (At least, the unmodified bits!)
Google does not distribute their software, so they do not have to make
their modifications public.
WRT the Linux kernel, Google is essentially a closed source
Google does not distribute their software, so they do not have to make
their modifications public.
They do for the kernel - they produce an appliance.
WRT the Linux kernel, Google is essentially a closed source company.
They've quietly fed little bits back now and then but not made a big
Alan Cox wrote:
Google does not distribute their software, so they do not have to make
their modifications public.
They do for the kernel - they produce an appliance.
Ah, I stand corrected.
WRT the Linux kernel, Google is essentially a closed source company.
They've quietly fed little
Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
Alan Cox wrote:
[...]
They've quietly fed little bits back now and then but not made a big song
and dance about it. Hopefully with Andrew there and the like more will
occur.
Strange that the NIC and SATA driver bits never seem to be among those
little
On 5/23/07, Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
Google does not distribute their software, so they do not have to make
their modifications public.
They do for the kernel - they produce an appliance.
Ah, I stand corrected.
WRT the Linux kernel, Google is essentially a
12 matches
Mail list logo
