[Fwd: Very aggressive swapping after 2 hours rest]

2000-09-16 Thread safemode
Trever Adams wrote: > Rik van Riel wrote: > > > I believe this is a tuning issue, so > > > i do not complain :) > > > > Indeed. Now that the testing base for the VM patch > > has increased so much, there are a few as-of-yet > > untested workloads popping up that don't perform > > very well.

[Fwd: Very aggressive swapping after 2 hours rest]

2000-09-16 Thread safemode
Trever Adams wrote: Rik van Riel wrote: I believe this is a tuning issue, so i do not complain :) Indeed. Now that the testing base for the VM patch has increased so much, there are a few as-of-yet untested workloads popping up that don't perform very well. I'm gathering