> "Jeff" == Jeff V Merkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jeff> He said memory to memory transfers.
I also said data aquisition servers to data processing clients.
Jes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please
He said memory to memory transfers.
Jeff
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > > I'd love to see a netware box sustain 110MB/sec (MB as in mega byte)
> > > memory to memory in two TCP streams between dual 400MHz P2 boxes.
> >
> > What the hell does a NUMA interconnect have to do with networking. Who
> >
> "Jeff" == Jeff V Merkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jeff> Jes Sorensen wrote:
>> I'd love to see a netware box sustain 110MB/sec (MB as in mega
>> byte) memory to memory in two TCP streams between dual 400MHz P2
>> boxes.
Jeff> What the hell does a NUMA interconnect have to do with
Jeff>
> > I'd love to see a netware box sustain 110MB/sec (MB as in mega byte)
> > memory to memory in two TCP streams between dual 400MHz P2 boxes.
>
> What the hell does a NUMA interconnect have to do with networking. Who
> would be braindead enough to waste processing cycles passing Network
> data
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > file system operation. What I wrote is THREE TIMES FASTER THAN WHAT'S
> > IN LINUX. Care to do a challenge. Let's take my NetWare code and see
> > which is faster and lower latency on a Network. Mine or Linux's. I bet
> > you $100.00 it will beat the Linux code in
> file system operation. What I wrote is THREE TIMES FASTER THAN WHAT'S
> IN LINUX. Care to do a challenge. Let's take my NetWare code and see
> which is faster and lower latency on a Network. Mine or Linux's. I bet
> you $100.00 it will beat the Linux code in every test.
At what. IPX -
Jes Sorensen wrote:
>
> > "Jeff" == Jeff V Merkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jeff> Jes,
>
> Jeff> I wrote the SMP ODI networking layer in NetWare that used today by
> Jeff> over 90,000,000 NetWare users. I also wrote the SMP LLC8022
> Jeff> Stack, the SMP IPX/SPX Stack, and the
Jes,
I wrote the SMP ODI networking layer in NetWare that used today by over
90,000,000 NetWare users. I also wrote the SMP LLC8022 Stack, the SMP
IPX/SPX Stack, and the SMP OSPF TCPIP stack in NetWare. I think I know
what the hell I'm doing here. Most Network protocols assume a
Jes,
I wrote the SMP ODI networking layer in NetWare that used today by over
90,000,000 NetWare users. I also wrote the SMP LLC8022 Stack, the SMP
IPX/SPX Stack, and the SMP OSPF TCPIP stack in NetWare. I think I know
what the hell I'm doing here. Most Network protocols assume a
Jes Sorensen wrote:
"Jeff" == Jeff V Merkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jeff Jes,
Jeff I wrote the SMP ODI networking layer in NetWare that used today by
Jeff over 90,000,000 NetWare users. I also wrote the SMP LLC8022
Jeff Stack, the SMP IPX/SPX Stack, and the SMP OSPF TCPIP
file system operation. What I wrote is THREE TIMES FASTER THAN WHAT'S
IN LINUX. Care to do a challenge. Let's take my NetWare code and see
which is faster and lower latency on a Network. Mine or Linux's. I bet
you $100.00 it will beat the Linux code in every test.
At what. IPX - sure.
"Jeff" == Jeff V Merkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jeff Jes Sorensen wrote:
I'd love to see a netware box sustain 110MB/sec (MB as in mega
byte) memory to memory in two TCP streams between dual 400MHz P2
boxes.
Jeff What the hell does a NUMA interconnect have to do with
Jeff networking.
12 matches
Mail list logo