On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 10:32:04PM +0100, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
> On Monday 05 September 2005 21:13, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 08:35:14PM +0100, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
> > > On Monday 05 September 2005 18:41, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > > Hi Linus.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > How is this different from the preempt module vermagic?
> > >
> > > ~$ modinfo agpgart | grep vermagic
> > > vermagic: 2.6.13 preempt gcc-4.0
> >
> > My bad. Adding PREEMT to UTS_VERSION makes it visible in uname -a.
> >
>
> I see. I can understand adding an extraversion for SMP and ex
On Monday 05 September 2005 21:13, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 08:35:14PM +0100, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
> > On Monday 05 September 2005 18:41, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > Hi Linus.
> > >
> > > kbuild updates as accumulated over the last few months.
> > > All patches has been
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 08:35:14PM +0100, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
> On Monday 05 September 2005 18:41, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > Hi Linus.
> >
> > kbuild updates as accumulated over the last few months.
> > All patches has been in -mm in one or several versions.
> >
> > Most noteworthy:
> > 1)
On Monday 05 September 2005 18:41, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Linus.
>
> kbuild updates as accumulated over the last few months.
> All patches has been in -mm in one or several versions.
>
> Most noteworthy:
> 1) -Wundef added to CFLAGS. This is the cause of several new warnings,
>which for the m
Hi Linus.
kbuild updates as accumulated over the last few months.
All patches has been in -mm in one or several versions.
Most noteworthy:
1) -Wundef added to CFLAGS. This is the cause of several new warnings,
which for the most part has been fixed for now.
2) "PREEMPT" in UTS_VERSION. So we c
6 matches
Mail list logo