On Tue, 15 Dec 2020 at 09:19, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> Hi Ulf,
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 9:23 PM Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 08:32, Geert Uytterhoeven
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 11:15 PM Doug Anderson
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 1:55 PM
Hi Ulf,
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 9:23 PM Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 08:32, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 11:15 PM Doug Anderson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 1:55 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 9:23 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
> >
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 08:32, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 11:15 PM Doug Anderson wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 1:55 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 9:23 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 3:06 PM Arnd
Hi Doug,
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 11:15 PM Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 1:55 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 9:23 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 3:06 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 12:39 PM Ulf Hansson
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 1:55 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 9:23 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 3:06 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 12:39 PM Ulf Hansson
> > > wrote:
> > > > So, I think we have two options. If people
CC devicetree
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 3:06 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 12:39 PM Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > So, I think we have two options. If people are willing to move to
> > "disk labels" or to patch their DTBs with mmc aliases, things can stay
> > as is. Otherwise, we can
Hi!
> > On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 12:51 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > >
> > > - Some DT patches for the Rockchip RK3399 platform,
> > >in particular fixing the MMC device ordering that
> > >recently became nondeterministic with async probe.
> >
> > Uhhuh.
> >
> > I didn't realize this MMC
On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 at 19:23, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 10:11 AM Doug Anderson wrote:
> >
> > So I guess the answer here is: strive very hard but you don't have to
> > guarantee that every corner case is covered?
>
> Yes. Covering every possible theoretical case is
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 10:22:58AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > I guess the question is: why is static assignment of numbers not an
> > acceptable solution to the problem? It gives us the desired fixed
> > numbers and automatically avoids all weird probe ordering / dependency
> > problems.
>
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 10:15:29AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 10:05 AM Russell King - ARM Linux admin
> wrote:
> >
> > If you think that /dev/sda for example is always the machine's internal
> > HDD, that is wrong.
>
> Yes. See the whole part about
>
> "Note that it
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 10:11 AM Doug Anderson wrote:
>
> So I guess the answer here is: strive very hard but you don't have to
> guarantee that every corner case is covered?
Yes. Covering every possible theoretical case is basically impossible.
I mean, it can be something like "the firmware
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 10:05 AM Russell King - ARM Linux admin
wrote:
>
> If you think that /dev/sda for example is always the machine's internal
> HDD, that is wrong.
Yes. See the whole part about
"Note that it really is only the internal devices that matter. Once you
start plugging in an
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 9:44 AM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> So basically, the way the async probing works for say SCSI is that we
> have multiple "layers of asynchroniety". We have the usual "init calls
> done asynchronously", but then within the init calls themselves you
> can start sub-scans
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 09:44:03AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 9:04 AM Doug Anderson wrote:
> >
> > Without static assignment, maybe we could do numbering of MMC devices
> > in some type of a pre-probe routine? Is that what you're suggesting?
>
> Yes.
>
> So
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 9:04 AM Doug Anderson wrote:
>
> Without static assignment, maybe we could do numbering of MMC devices
> in some type of a pre-probe routine? Is that what you're suggesting?
Yes.
So basically, the way the async probing works for say SCSI is that we
have multiple "layers
Hi Linus,
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 3:02 PM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 12:51 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > - Some DT patches for the Rockchip RK3399 platform,
> >in particular fixing the MMC device ordering that
> >recently became nondeterministic with async
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 2:56 PM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 12:51 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > - Some DT patches for the Rockchip RK3399 platform,
> >in particular fixing the MMC device ordering that
> >recently became nondeterministic with async probe.
>
>
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 12:51 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> - Some DT patches for the Rockchip RK3399 platform,
>in particular fixing the MMC device ordering that
>recently became nondeterministic with async probe.
Uhhuh.
I didn't realize this MMC breakage happened.
That's just an MMC
18 matches
Mail list logo
