Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> This leaves the following empty construct:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_COLDFIRE
> #else
> #endif
Odd. It emitted it in both headers, which it shouldn't have.
> I'll remove it in a subsequent patch.
Thanks.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:15 AM, David Howells wrote:
> arch/m68k/include/asm/ptrace.h | 72 +
This leaves the following empty construct:
#ifdef CONFIG_COLDFIRE
#else
#endif
I'll remove it in a subsequent patch.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:15 AM, David Howells wrote:
> Can you merge the following branch into the m68k tree please.
Thanks!
I will look into it, but I won't merge it before 3.7-rc1.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -
Can you merge the following branch into the m68k tree please.
This is to complete part of the UAPI disintegration for which the preparatory
patches were pulled recently.
Now that the fixups and the asm-generic chunk have been merged, I've
regenerated the patches to get rid of those dependencies a
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> I assume these c6x and asm-generic changes are the ones you just asked Linus
> to pull?
Yes.
> Doesn't it make more sense to ask us (the individual arch maintainers) to
> pull our parts after Linus has pulled the generic part?
I suppose so.
> Do you want this ("our
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:51 PM, David Howells wrote:
> git://git.infradead.org/users/dhowells/linux-headers.git disintegrate-m68k
>
> for you to fetch changes up to b039235da939b28c539b3e1b4566107a9bdbdef8:
>
> UAPI: (Scripted) Disintegrate arch/m68k/include/asm (2012-10-04 18:20:56
> +0100)
Can you merge the following branch into the m68k tree please.
This is to complete part of the UAPI disintegration for which the preparatory
patches were pulled recently.
Note that there are some fixup patches which are at the base of the branch
aimed at you, plus all arches get the asm-generic br
7 matches
Mail list logo
